How was Unity 2000 supposed to unite the Valiant universes?

Discuss the VALIANT comics, characters, and collecting.
PLEASE DO NOT REVEAL SPOILER INFORMATION IN YOUR TOPIC TITLE.

Moderators: Daniel Jackson, greg

User avatar
RobInOttawa
100 posts! (if you round to the nearest 100)
100 posts! (if you round to the nearest 100)
Posts: 52
Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 1:21:50 am
Location: Ottawa, Canada
How was Unity 2000 supposed to unite the Valiant universes?

Post by RobInOttawa »

*** WARNING *** Possible spoilers.
#
#
#
I've just finished reading Jim Shooter's outline of Unity 2000 (Issues 1 through 6) and was shocked by how it would have ended.

Essentially, Jim treated the VH3 universe ("Prime" valiant characters) as the real Valiant universe. In the end, the VH1 Solar collapsed the multiverse into a single VH3 valiant universe and wiped out everything else. He then kills himself so that the VH3 Phil and Gayle can live their lives together in the VH3 valiant universe.

This wipes out Jim Shooter's contributions for creating the great and memorable VH1 universe, and the contributions of every one else involved. It's like getting revenge on the company he helped create.

Why would Acclaim want this published instead of trying the "Final Solution" idea?

If Unity 2000 #6 were printed in 1999, I would have definately left the Valiant universe for good since all ties to it would be erased.

User avatar
greg
The admin around here must be getting old and soft.
The admin around here must be getting old and soft.
Posts: 22861
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2004 9:39:27 am
Valiant fan since: Rai #0
Favorite character: Depends on title
Favorite title: Depends on writer
Favorite writer: Depends on artist
Favorite artist: Depends on character
Location: Indoors
Contact:

Post by greg »

Paging TimeWillTell... TimeWillTell to customer service... :wink:

User avatar
TimeWillTell
Still Valiant after all these years.
Still Valiant after all these years.
Posts: 436
Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2005 10:27:42 am

Post by TimeWillTell »

Paging TimeWillTell... TimeWillTell to customer service...
Ahem.... Hello.
May I help you?

-TWT

User avatar
TimeWillTell
Still Valiant after all these years.
Still Valiant after all these years.
Posts: 436
Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2005 10:27:42 am

Post by TimeWillTell »

Sorry you feel that way Rob.
-TWT

User avatar
TimeWillTell
Still Valiant after all these years.
Still Valiant after all these years.
Posts: 436
Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2005 10:27:42 am

Post by TimeWillTell »

If Unity 2000 #6 were printed in 1999, I would have definately left the VALIANT universe for good since all ties to it would be erased.
Well... It didn't happen did it?

-TWT

User avatar
Schmakt
You gotta have Faith!
You gotta have Faith!
Posts: 762
Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2004 10:23:27 pm
Location: Charlotte, NC
Contact:

Post by Schmakt »

interesting thread regarding Unity2k:
viewtopic.php?t=7222&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=0

User avatar
RobInOttawa
100 posts! (if you round to the nearest 100)
100 posts! (if you round to the nearest 100)
Posts: 52
Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 1:21:50 am
Location: Ottawa, Canada

Post by RobInOttawa »

Thanks "Schmakt" and "TimeWillTell"

I'm glad at least the very end of Unity 2000 #6 did not happen.

Thanks for the link to the older thread. This is really cool:

http://www.theartistschoice.com/rubinst ... #UNITY2000

Maybe I wouldn't completely leave the Valiant Universe had these issues been printed. However, I'm a strong supporter of the original VH1 Valiant universe and am currently reading the "pre-unity" issues for the first time in 12 years or so. If after Unity 2000, Acclaim decided NOT to return to the basics and focus on strong continuity and story telling, then I would not really be interested.

The idea that Unity 2000 would undo what was done before seems upsetting.

User avatar
leonmallett
My mind is sharp. Like a sharp thing.
My mind is sharp. Like a sharp thing.
Posts: 9444
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 9:39:01 am
Valiant fan since: 2006
Favorite character: Shadowman (Hall version)
Favorite title: Shadowman (under Hall)
Favorite writer: Fred Van Lente
Favorite artist: Clayton Henry
Location: hunting down paulsmith56 somewhere in the balti belt...

Post by leonmallett »

RobInOttawa wrote:Thanks "Schmakt" and "TimeWillTell"

I'm glad at least the very end of Unity 2000 #6 did not happen.
I agree, but the intriguing question is - if Unity 2000 had been completed and we then had no potential for a return of VH 1, then would this site exist: would any of us be bothered? Is it the hope for a return of VALIANT that spurs the site, or a fondness for comics from the past?

User avatar
greg
The admin around here must be getting old and soft.
The admin around here must be getting old and soft.
Posts: 22861
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2004 9:39:27 am
Valiant fan since: Rai #0
Favorite character: Depends on title
Favorite title: Depends on writer
Favorite writer: Depends on artist
Favorite artist: Depends on character
Location: Indoors
Contact:

Post by greg »

leonmallett wrote:
RobInOttawa wrote:Thanks "Schmakt" and "TimeWillTell"

I'm glad at least the very end of Unity 2000 #6 did not happen.
I agree, but the intriguing question is - if Unity 2000 had been completed and we then had no potential for a return of VH 1, then would this site exist: would any of us be bothered? Is it the hope for a return of VALIANT that spurs the site, or a fondness for comics from the past?
Interesting question...

I believe the mutual fondness for early VALIANT is the core connection...
with all of us having different opinions as to where the fondness ends,
with regard to later VALIANT, Acclaim, later Acclaim, some Acclaim, etc.

Unity 2000 as a completed project would have served to establish what
VALIANT meant with respect to Acclaim... but I don't think it would have
"ended" the fondness for VALIANT that the fans have.

Most agree that whatever Acclaim is... it's not VALIANT.
The love for VALIANT pre-dates Acclaim, and those memories can't be "harmed"
by whatever might have followed.

User avatar
leonmallett
My mind is sharp. Like a sharp thing.
My mind is sharp. Like a sharp thing.
Posts: 9444
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 9:39:01 am
Valiant fan since: 2006
Favorite character: Shadowman (Hall version)
Favorite title: Shadowman (under Hall)
Favorite writer: Fred Van Lente
Favorite artist: Clayton Henry
Location: hunting down paulsmith56 somewhere in the balti belt...

Post by leonmallett »

Most agree that whatever Acclaim is... it's not VALIANT.
The love for VALIANT pre-dates Acclaim, and those memories can't be "harmed"
by whatever might have followed.
Fair point. The question I would then ask is about Jim Shooters intent. Was he determined to undo his own legacy, much like Bob Layton with X-O 68, so that others could not touch it?

Was he trying to craft an intersting (and possibly very brave) story?

Was he biting the hand that was feeding him?

Something else?

User avatar
RobInOttawa
100 posts! (if you round to the nearest 100)
100 posts! (if you round to the nearest 100)
Posts: 52
Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 1:21:50 am
Location: Ottawa, Canada

Post by RobInOttawa »

I've been reading some back posts of "'TimeWillTell" and really like his opinions and insights to what happened.

The ValiantComics website and forum has done more than just rekindle my interest for the Valiant comics. It is very interesting to read the previous posts and gain new insights to the actual Valiant, Acclaim, and Valiant Entertainment companies.

However, the challenge I find myself in is that this is a very established forum that has been around for many years. It seems much easier to read postings than to post or reply to topics myself.

So much has been covered and to a great extent. Is it worthwhile to re-hash something that may have been talked about before and to a much larger extent?

With respect to "TimeWillTell"

I have a great fondness for Valiant comics (as I remember them, which is before Acclaim purchased the company), much more so than Marvel or DC, because of the great writing.

After reading several of his posts, I realize that I really should not discount Acclaim's contributions to the Valiant mythology without at least reading some of the VH2 and VH3 stuff. Perhaps Quantum & Woody, Dr. Tomorrow, and Shadowman Vol 3.

Reading the previous posts shows that people involved in Acclaim comics were in a challenging position to turn around their Valiant company purchase:

(1) They had paid double of what it was worth
(2) The comic industry was imploding all around them
(3) Way too many issues of a single comic were being printed, causing Comic Book Dealers to think that Valiant was a bad gamble. I remember seeing multiple Valiant comics in $1.00 bins around a year after I stopped reading them.
(4) The majority of the existing fan base was leaving or had left (myself included)

At least people like "TimeWillTell" tried to keep the Valiant characters alive, and had attempted to create new fans and keep existing fans happy until Acclaim went bankrupt.

Hopefully, if Valiant Entertainment does re-introduce the Valiant universe in the future, they will use what worked in the past and avoid the same mistakes that were made.

User avatar
RobInOttawa
100 posts! (if you round to the nearest 100)
100 posts! (if you round to the nearest 100)
Posts: 52
Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 1:21:50 am
Location: Ottawa, Canada

Post by RobInOttawa »

As for Unity 2000. I really enjoyed reading the plot for issues 1 through 6, but was disappointed by the ending. The reason I started this post.

The Valiant VH1 universe should not have been discarded as if it never should have existed. Of course, Unity 2000 #4, #5, and #6 were never officially published so the ending doesn't really count.

User avatar
Elveen
I sell comics, I collect Valiant.
I sell comics, I collect Valiant.
Posts: 25252
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2006 2:44:48 am
Location: Educating the future of America, or something like that

Post by Elveen »

RobInOttawa wrote: However, the challenge I find myself in is that this is a very established forum that has been around for many years. It seems much easier to read postings than to post or reply to topics myself.

So much has been covered and to a great extent. Is it worthwhile to re-hash something that may have been talked about before and to a much larger extent?
One of my core beliefs is... "Participate don't spectate"

I have found that the people that call this board home are very welcoming and inviting... I have had traded PMs and phone calls with many on this board (about comics, children, jobs, personal stuff, everything)... and ALL have been super cool! Many have gone out-of-their way to help me (and I know that I am not the only one that has experienced this)

So Rob I would reccomend you post anything that you would like, especially about VALIANT comics... even if it has been talked about before, there will be plenty who would love to discuss it again.

Start a new thread or search for an old thread... add your .02, and then someone else will add after you....

If nothing else, I've only been here a few months, and I love to discuss everything VALIANT... so post away. :thumb:

User avatar
Daniel Jackson
A toast to the return of Valiant!
A toast to the return of Valiant!
Posts: 38007
Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2004 8:33:38 pm

Post by Daniel Jackson »

RobInOttawa wrote:As for Unity 2000. I really enjoyed reading the plot for issues 1 through 6, but was disappointed by the ending. The reason I started this post.

The VALIANT VH1 universe should not have been discarded as if it never should have existed. Of course, Unity 2000 #4, #5, and #6 were never officially published so the ending doesn't really count.
A lot of people were unhappy with Unity 2000, but remember that Jim was brought in to fix the mess that Acclaim had made with the characters while still making Acclaim happy by keeping whatever they wanted still intact.

Personaly, I would like to see the series get finished either with the story Jim already laid out or preferably with him rewriting the last 3 issues again without Acclaim looking over his shoulder.

User avatar
leonmallett
My mind is sharp. Like a sharp thing.
My mind is sharp. Like a sharp thing.
Posts: 9444
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 9:39:01 am
Valiant fan since: 2006
Favorite character: Shadowman (Hall version)
Favorite title: Shadowman (under Hall)
Favorite writer: Fred Van Lente
Favorite artist: Clayton Henry
Location: hunting down paulsmith56 somewhere in the balti belt...

Post by leonmallett »

Daniel Jackson wrote:
RobInOttawa wrote:As for Unity 2000. I really enjoyed reading the plot for issues 1 through 6, but was disappointed by the ending. The reason I started this post.

The VALIANT VH1 universe should not have been discarded as if it never should have existed. Of course, Unity 2000 #4, #5, and #6 were never officially published so the ending doesn't really count.
A lot of people were unhappy with Unity 2000, but remember that Jim was brought in to fix the mess that Acclaim had made with the characters while still making Acclaim happy by keeping whatever they wanted still intact.

Personaly, I would like to see the series get finished either with the story Jim already laid out or preferably with him rewriting the last 3 issues again without Acclaim looking over his shoulder.
But would it be the 'same' story with a different ending? Would JS want to rekindle involvement with VALIANT/VH 1? Plus wasn't UNITY a misnomer - surely something indicating widespread devastation would have been more approriate? Just curious...

steverino
Account deactivated by administrator.
Posts: 5504
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 3:26:15 am

Post by steverino »

Elveen wrote: Many have gone out-of-their way to help me (and I know that I am not the only one that has experienced this)
Got that right. :thumb:

This is a great bunch of guys.

steverino
Account deactivated by administrator.
Posts: 5504
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 3:26:15 am

Post by steverino »

leonmallett wrote:
Daniel Jackson wrote:
RobInOttawa wrote:As for Unity 2000. I really enjoyed reading the plot for issues 1 through 6, but was disappointed by the ending. The reason I started this post.

The VALIANT VH1 universe should not have been discarded as if it never should have existed. Of course, Unity 2000 #4, #5, and #6 were never officially published so the ending doesn't really count.
A lot of people were unhappy with Unity 2000, but remember that Jim was brought in to fix the mess that Acclaim had made with the characters while still making Acclaim happy by keeping whatever they wanted still intact.

Personaly, I would like to see the series get finished either with the story Jim already laid out or preferably with him rewriting the last 3 issues again without Acclaim looking over his shoulder.
But would it be the 'same' story with a different ending? Would JS want to rekindle involvement with VALIANT/VH 1? Plus wasn't UNITY a misnomer - surely something indicating widespread devastation would have been more approriate? Just curious...
I personally think he would. I believe that he truly loved VH1 and that if it was on a strong foundation he would return to continue what he started.

But that's just my 2 cents.

User avatar
wrunow
Where are you now?
Where are you now?
Posts: 3657
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2004 10:10:29 am
Valiant fan since: 1991
Favorite character: They killed her off!
Favorite title: Harbinger
Favorite writer: Dysart
Favorite artist: Nord
Location: York, Maine

Post by wrunow »

leonmallett wrote:
Most agree that whatever Acclaim is... it's not VALIANT.
The love for VALIANT pre-dates Acclaim, and those memories can't be "harmed"
by whatever might have followed.
Fair point. The question I would then ask is about Jim Shooters intent. Was he determined to undo his own legacy, much like Bob Layton with X-O 68, so that others could not touch it?

Was he trying to craft an intersting (and possibly very brave) story?

Was he biting the hand that was feeding him?

Something else?
This was a question that was discussed at length at the VALIANT panel discussion at the NYC con I believe on Sunday afternoon. I would think a transcript of that discussion would go a long way here. Does anyone know if anything like that exists? I know that Valerie recorded that Sunday session on audio and that Saturday session is on video somewhere.

Maybe John (svair) has some idea.
I am selling "nothing" on ebay-yet.

User avatar
leonmallett
My mind is sharp. Like a sharp thing.
My mind is sharp. Like a sharp thing.
Posts: 9444
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 9:39:01 am
Valiant fan since: 2006
Favorite character: Shadowman (Hall version)
Favorite title: Shadowman (under Hall)
Favorite writer: Fred Van Lente
Favorite artist: Clayton Henry
Location: hunting down paulsmith56 somewhere in the balti belt...

Post by leonmallett »

wrunow wrote:
leonmallett wrote:
Most agree that whatever Acclaim is... it's not VALIANT.
The love for VALIANT pre-dates Acclaim, and those memories can't be "harmed"
by whatever might have followed.
Fair point. The question I would then ask is about Jim Shooters intent. Was he determined to undo his own legacy, much like Bob Layton with X-O 68, so that others could not touch it?

Was he trying to craft an intersting (and possibly very brave) story?

Was he biting the hand that was feeding him?

Something else?
This was a question that was discussed at length at the VALIANT panel discussion at the NYC con I believe on Sunday afternoon. I would think a transcript of that discussion would go a long way here. Does anyone know if anything like that exists? I know that Valerie recorded that Sunday session on audio and that Saturday session is on video somewhere.

Maybe John (svair) has some idea.
If not a transcript - could anyone post key points?

acc205
My posts can all fit in a short box
My posts can all fit in a short box
Posts: 189
Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2004 3:57:22 am
Location: downtown

Post by acc205 »

RobInOttawa wrote: (1) They had paid double of what it was worth
Hmm, not sure if thats true.

from a jim shooter artcile
In other business dealings, I ran into a guy named Enrique Senior, who was second in command of Allen & Company. He was actually the one selling Valiant, conducting the sale or at least in charge of it. He said, they were actually negotiating with people for about $250 million. It actually makes sense. An entertainment venture company that's making about $25 million in pre-tax profit and then multiple of 20. Discount it down to $10. $250 million isn't outrageous.

User avatar
RobInOttawa
100 posts! (if you round to the nearest 100)
100 posts! (if you round to the nearest 100)
Posts: 52
Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 1:21:50 am
Location: Ottawa, Canada

Post by RobInOttawa »

In the June 1994 Defiant comics, Jim shooter writes:

... "Several years later, when Valiant was stolen out from under me, many people expressed their condolences, their support, their outrage - but as a practical matter the industry turned a blind eye. I wasn't surprised. Valiant was a big money maker for the distributors and retailers, an important advertiser to the trade publications, and well-entrenched with the fans. The trade press, if anything made apologies for the pirates"

... "It may interest you to know that on April 8, 1994 it was anounced that Valiant, or more properly Voyager Communications Inc., was sold by the pirates and weasels who stole it to Acclaim Entertainment for $65 million"



Bob Layton writes in his October 2004 archived posts (boblayton.com):

"Greg Fischbach, the C.E.O. of Acclaim Entertainment, offered 65 million for Valiant—with about a 50/50 split in cash and Acclaim stock, valued at the time at $16.00 per share. Ironically, if he had done his homework, Fischbach would have discovered that Valiant was only market valued at around 30 million. "

Acclaim paid double for Valiant than what it was worth at the time.

User avatar
Unblessed
I must be flogged.
I must be flogged.
Posts: 5533
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2005 11:00:51 pm
Location: Slippin' through the trees, stanglin' the breeze

Post by Unblessed »

"Magic Ink"


And this was to be Mr. Shooter's F U to all those that destroied his universe, not the fans.

User avatar
leonmallett
My mind is sharp. Like a sharp thing.
My mind is sharp. Like a sharp thing.
Posts: 9444
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 9:39:01 am
Valiant fan since: 2006
Favorite character: Shadowman (Hall version)
Favorite title: Shadowman (under Hall)
Favorite writer: Fred Van Lente
Favorite artist: Clayton Henry
Location: hunting down paulsmith56 somewhere in the balti belt...

Post by leonmallett »

Unblessed wrote:"Magic Ink"


And this was to be Mr. Shooter's F U to all those that destroied his universe, not the fans.
Sorry if I'm being a bit dense - 'magic ink'? :?

User avatar
slym2none
a typical message board assassin
a typical message board assassin
Posts: 37119
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 12:08:46 pm
Location: Troll- free zone.

Post by slym2none »

leonmallett wrote:
Unblessed wrote:"Magic Ink"


And this was to be Mr. Shooter's F U to all those that destroied his universe, not the fans.
Sorry if I'm being a bit dense - 'magic ink'? :?
Trust me - you are better off not knowing.

:|



-slym ( :thumb: )

User avatar
leonmallett
My mind is sharp. Like a sharp thing.
My mind is sharp. Like a sharp thing.
Posts: 9444
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 9:39:01 am
Valiant fan since: 2006
Favorite character: Shadowman (Hall version)
Favorite title: Shadowman (under Hall)
Favorite writer: Fred Van Lente
Favorite artist: Clayton Henry
Location: hunting down paulsmith56 somewhere in the balti belt...

Post by leonmallett »

slym2none wrote:
leonmallett wrote:
Unblessed wrote:"Magic Ink"


And this was to be Mr. Shooter's F U to all those that destroied his universe, not the fans.
Sorry if I'm being a bit dense - 'magic ink'? :?
Trust me - you are better off not knowing.

:|



-slym ( :thumb: )
I consider myself warned. :hm:


Post Reply