What are the latest opinions on CGC grading?

Discussion of all "slabbed comics" whether Valiant or not

Moderators: Daniel Jackson, greg

Post Reply
User avatar
StarBrand
loosely based on a true story
loosely based on a true story
Posts: 17646
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2005 5:49:05 pm
Contact:
What are the latest opinions on CGC grading?

Post by StarBrand »

What are the latest opinions on CGC grading? Do they seem stricter in the last year or so than previously, about the same, or less strict?
Valiant is the son of the New Universe.

Funcha
My posts can all fit in a short box
My posts can all fit in a short box
Posts: 150
Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2015 3:15:57 pm
Valiant fan since: 1992
Favorite character: X-O Manowar
Favorite title: X-O Manowar
Favorite writer: Bob Layton
Favorite artist: Barry Windsor Smith
Re: What are the latest opinions on CGC grading?

Post by Funcha »

Everybody is saying really strict. I have no idea though. Pretty much everything I send in I carefully screen to make sure they're true 9.6/9.8 contenders. I personally grade very tightly, so am having a lot of success in hitting 9.8s.

User avatar
TheeBaldMoose
Rockin' out in Torquehalla
Rockin' out in Torquehalla
Posts: 2451
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2016 12:03:41 pm
Valiant fan since: ECCC April 2016
Favorite character: Bloodshot/Ninjak/Divinity
Favorite title: Divinity/BS Reborn/Britannia
Favorite writer: Kindt/Lemire/Roberts
Favorite artist: All of them, really
Location: Tacoma
Re: What are the latest opinions on CGC grading?

Post by TheeBaldMoose »

If they are getting stricter, they are getting lazier in other areas.

Grader notes, I am getting fewer and fewer of them even though I have paid for them. Makes me wonder if the $150 is even worth it anymore. Sure, it handles some of the slabbing, but that's only $18 per book. If there are no notes, then why the hell would I pay extra for the services?
Moose

User avatar
greg
The admin around here must be getting old and soft.
The admin around here must be getting old and soft.
Posts: 22861
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2004 9:39:27 am
Valiant fan since: Rai #0
Favorite character: Depends on title
Favorite title: Depends on writer
Favorite writer: Depends on artist
Favorite artist: Depends on character
Location: Indoors
Contact:
Re: What are the latest opinions on CGC grading?

Post by greg »

I ran the numbers about a year ago. It's pretty clear that CGC started "gifting" 9.8 grades on modern books around late-2008.
They've been pulling back (getting stricter) since then, but it still seems easier to get a 9.8 today than pre-2008.

There's no reason that Amazing Spider-man #300 and Harbinger #1 should have similar charts for CGC 9.8 submissions, except that CGC is doing similar things at the same times in their grading results.

Image



Image

User avatar
GGSAE
Getting that sauce across the border ain't easy.
Getting that sauce across the border ain't easy.
Posts: 4086
Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2005 12:23:19 pm
Location: Otown
Re: What are the latest opinions on CGC grading?

Post by GGSAE »

So Gregory an astute collector would go after those 9.6s/9.4s (pre 2008) in hopes to get better grades under different grading conditions?

User avatar
greg
The admin around here must be getting old and soft.
The admin around here must be getting old and soft.
Posts: 22861
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2004 9:39:27 am
Valiant fan since: Rai #0
Favorite character: Depends on title
Favorite title: Depends on writer
Favorite writer: Depends on artist
Favorite artist: Depends on character
Location: Indoors
Contact:
Re: What are the latest opinions on CGC grading?

Post by greg »

GGSAE wrote:So Gregory an astute collector would go after those 9.6s/9.4s (pre 2008) in hopes to get better grades under different grading conditions?
That's one way to look at it. Another would be to go after 9.6s/9.4s graded pre-2008 at significantly lower prices than 9.8, then compare to 9.8s already in your collection. Then sell any 9.8s that look worse than the 9.6s and 9.4s. Downgrade your 9.8s to cost-savings AND better-looking books. Win-Win.

Pressing and regrading wouldn't even be necessary, but it might be a third "Win" sometime in the future.

markie7235
My posts can all fit in a short box
My posts can all fit in a short box
Posts: 208
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2008 11:52:24 am
Re: What are the latest opinions on CGC grading?

Post by markie7235 »

I personally feel they still are inconsistent

I sent in an X-O #4 and A&A #0 from VH1 that had no discernible issues, both came back 9.6. I sent in a pink Harbinger #0 that I would have called a 9.2, maybe a 9.4 that had some slight spine roll to it, and it came back a 9.6, which was a very nice pleasant surprise.

I also submitted a Harbinger #1 VH1 in similar condition to a 9.2 copy I own and it came back an 8.5

For a company trying to identify itself as the gold standard of consistent and definitive grading, still a lot of dumb luck on who grades your book it seems.

User avatar
Ricomortis
lookin pu nub in all da wong pwaces
lookin pu nub in all da wong pwaces
Posts: 1905
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 9:31:46 pm
Valiant fan since: 1991
Favorite character: Shadowman - Harada
Favorite title: Imperium
Favorite writer: Dysart & Fred Van Lente
Favorite artist: Larosa, Henry & CAFU
Re: What are the latest opinions on CGC grading?

Post by Ricomortis »

markie7235 wrote:I personally feel they still are inconsistent

I sent in an X-O #4 and A&A #0 from VH1 that had no discernible issues, both came back 9.6. I sent in a pink Harbinger #0 that I would have called a 9.2, maybe a 9.4 that had some slight spine roll to it, and it came back a 9.6, which was a very nice pleasant surprise.

I also submitted a Harbinger #1 VH1 in similar condition to a 9.2 copy I own and it came back an 8.5

For a company trying to identify itself as the gold standard of consistent and definitive grading, still a lot of dumb luck on who grades your book it seems.
I disagree
Image
Image
Image

Check out my Gallery for this year: A year in the life of Ricomortis (2018) http://www.valiantfans.com/forum/viewto ... 35&t=50927" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Check out my Gallery for last year: "A year in the life of Ricomortis (2017)" http://www.valiantfans.com/forum/viewto ... 6#p1056798" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

markie7235
My posts can all fit in a short box
My posts can all fit in a short box
Posts: 208
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2008 11:52:24 am
Re: What are the latest opinions on CGC grading?

Post by markie7235 »

Ricomortis wrote:
markie7235 wrote:I personally feel they still are inconsistent

I sent in an X-O #4 and A&A #0 from VH1 that had no discernible issues, both came back 9.6. I sent in a pink Harbinger #0 that I would have called a 9.2, maybe a 9.4 that had some slight spine roll to it, and it came back a 9.6, which was a very nice pleasant surprise.

I also submitted a Harbinger #1 VH1 in similar condition to a 9.2 copy I own and it came back an 8.5

For a company trying to identify itself as the gold standard of consistent and definitive grading, still a lot of dumb luck on who grades your book it seems.
I disagree
Fair enough, care to elaborate why?

User avatar
TheeBaldMoose
Rockin' out in Torquehalla
Rockin' out in Torquehalla
Posts: 2451
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2016 12:03:41 pm
Valiant fan since: ECCC April 2016
Favorite character: Bloodshot/Ninjak/Divinity
Favorite title: Divinity/BS Reborn/Britannia
Favorite writer: Kindt/Lemire/Roberts
Favorite artist: All of them, really
Location: Tacoma
Re: What are the latest opinions on CGC grading?

Post by TheeBaldMoose »

markie7235 wrote:
Ricomortis wrote:
markie7235 wrote:I personally feel they still are inconsistent

I sent in an X-O #4 and A&A #0 from VH1 that had no discernible issues, both came back 9.6. I sent in a pink Harbinger #0 that I would have called a 9.2, maybe a 9.4 that had some slight spine roll to it, and it came back a 9.6, which was a very nice pleasant surprise.

I also submitted a Harbinger #1 VH1 in similar condition to a 9.2 copy I own and it came back an 8.5

For a company trying to identify itself as the gold standard of consistent and definitive grading, still a lot of dumb luck on who grades your book it seems.
I disagree
Fair enough, care to elaborate why?
Did you get grader notes with your grades? that Harbinger #1 may have had some smaller errors that you weren't aware of. For your grades, these should all be telling you why your grades are the way they are.
Moose

markie7235
My posts can all fit in a short box
My posts can all fit in a short box
Posts: 208
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2008 11:52:24 am
Re: What are the latest opinions on CGC grading?

Post by markie7235 »

TheeBaldMoose wrote:
markie7235 wrote:
Ricomortis wrote:
markie7235 wrote:I personally feel they still are inconsistent

I sent in an X-O #4 and A&A #0 from VH1 that had no discernible issues, both came back 9.6. I sent in a pink Harbinger #0 that I would have called a 9.2, maybe a 9.4 that had some slight spine roll to it, and it came back a 9.6, which was a very nice pleasant surprise.

I also submitted a Harbinger #1 VH1 in similar condition to a 9.2 copy I own and it came back an 8.5

For a company trying to identify itself as the gold standard of consistent and definitive grading, still a lot of dumb luck on who grades your book it seems.
I disagree
Fair enough, care to elaborate why?
Did you get grader notes with your grades? that Harbinger #1 may have had some smaller errors that you weren't aware of. For your grades, these should all be telling you why your grades are the way they are.
Yes, I don't recall off hand, but they were fairly generic. For the 9.6 ones, there weren't really any notes.

It doesn't really bother me like some people, I still personally find 9.6 a really good grade and care more about how an issue displays in the slab than the number itself. I'm not getting books graded to flip, but to protect issues I have that are special to me or have some value to them. Unfortunately I have to store my collection of almost 700 Valiant comics (VH1 and VEI) in my man-cave that's in my basement. While the temperature and conditions are nice down there, it's still a basement, meaning moisture in the air. So for me the grading is to prevent possible damage, protect issues I feel are special, and also to display.

I only mentioned a couple of issues I've had graded, but more was calling out imo where I've seen discrepancies in grading. For example, I have a Magnus Robot Fighter #5 that came back a 9.8 even though the spine was starting to split at top and bottom, but my Solar #3 came back at 9.6 that had no noticeable issues on it all. Grader notes offered no information. Again, doesn't bother me, but just seems like there's some inconsistencies on some issues in the 9.4-9.8 range, or sometimes 8.5-9.2 range. Even my local comic shop who sends the books off for grading for me was surprised on what some of mine came back as in both situations: some graded higher than he expected or would have graded and others lower than what he expected.

User avatar
tarheelmarine
Ask me about the Mellow Mushroom
Ask me about the Mellow Mushroom
Posts: 3747
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2004 4:14:44 pm
Valiant fan since: 1992
Favorite character: Magnus Robot Fighter
Favorite title: Shadowman
Favorite writer: Jim Shooter
Favorite artist: Jim Calafiore
Location: Japan
Re: What are the latest opinions on CGC grading?

Post by tarheelmarine »

I only mentioned a couple of issues I've had graded, but more was calling out imo where I've seen discrepancies in grading. For example, I have a Magnus Robot Fighter #5 that came back a 9.8 even though the spine was starting to split at top and bottom, but my Solar #3 came back at 9.6 that had no noticeable issues on it all. Grader notes offered no information.
good point about issues with spine starting to split. was it there before it was graded or did putting it in the slab cause the split?

markie7235
My posts can all fit in a short box
My posts can all fit in a short box
Posts: 208
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2008 11:52:24 am
Re: What are the latest opinions on CGC grading?

Post by markie7235 »

tarheelmarine wrote:
I only mentioned a couple of issues I've had graded, but more was calling out imo where I've seen discrepancies in grading. For example, I have a Magnus Robot Fighter #5 that came back a 9.8 even though the spine was starting to split at top and bottom, but my Solar #3 came back at 9.6 that had no noticeable issues on it all. Grader notes offered no information.
good point about issues with spine starting to split. was it there before it was graded or did putting it in the slab cause the split?
To be honest, I dont recall. I think it was prior to grading because I wasn't expecting a 9.8. I figured a 9.2 maybe


Post Reply