How many.......?
Moderators: Daniel Jackson, greg
- jedimarley
- Evra'Ting Ire Mon.
- Posts: 16063
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:44 pm
It's amazing that Hobo and I are not involved in this discussion.greg wrote:Having to do that parade all by himself...Shadowmatt wrote:I don't know if he's THE gay, that's an awful lot of pressure to put on someone.ZephyrWasHOT!! wrote:"Are you da GAYYYYYY??"Erskine71 wrote:"Are you now or have you ever been a 'gay'?"ZephyrWasHOT!! wrote: Some folks think I should just bend over and accept what is.
Where's the smiley for that......?
- Daniel Jackson
- A toast to the return of Valiant!
- Posts: 38007
- Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2004 8:33 pm
Yeah, you two are starting to slip.jedimarley wrote:It's amazing that Hobo and I are not involved in this discussion.greg wrote:Having to do that parade all by himself...Shadowmatt wrote:I don't know if he's THE gay, that's an awful lot of pressure to put on someone.ZephyrWasHOT!! wrote:"Are you da GAYYYYYY??"Erskine71 wrote:"Are you now or have you ever been a 'gay'?"ZephyrWasHOT!! wrote: Some folks think I should just bend over and accept what is.
Where's the smiley for that......?
- jedimarley
- Evra'Ting Ire Mon.
- Posts: 16063
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:44 pm
I know.....Daniel Jackson wrote:Yeah, you two are starting to slip.jedimarley wrote:It's amazing that Hobo and I are not involved in this discussion.greg wrote:Having to do that parade all by himself...Shadowmatt wrote:I don't know if he's THE gay, that's an awful lot of pressure to put on someone.ZephyrWasHOT!! wrote:"Are you da GAYYYYYY??"Erskine71 wrote: "Are you now or have you ever been a 'gay'?"

-
- Chief of the Dia Tribe
- Posts: 22415
- Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2004 8:55 pm
Thanks boss....greg wrote:[THIS TOPIC HAS BEEN EDITED]
Comments in violation of messageboard policies have been removed
by request from this topic. (Follow-up comments have also been removed,
not for policy violations, but because they are "remnants" of
the original violation, referring to it in quotes, etc.)

- greg
- The admin around here must be getting old and soft.
- Posts: 22887
- Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2004 9:39 am
- Valiant fan since: Rai #0
- Favorite character: Depends on title
- Favorite title: Depends on writer
- Favorite writer: Depends on artist
- Favorite artist: Depends on character
- Location: Indoors
- Contact:
Comments directed toward another member which were a clear example of:Erskine71 wrote:Just for reference... Which policy was violated?
"Instigation (name-calling/baiting)"
http://www.valiantfans.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2125
Well, I'm definitely in your corner. It's a mind crime that someone would try to convince you shipping is not their problem. You hear it enough, you start to question your own idea of right and wrong.ZephyrWasHOT!! wrote:GJB wrote:At least 50% of what I win on ebay falls into this category. There are some really good sellers, particularly from these boards, that do a great job of appreciating the books after they are sold and ship them accordingly.
Then you have the ones that don't care or lack common sense.
I've told sellers I will pay extra to secure my purchase. Then after no response to my offer, I receive a bent up book protected by one flimsy piece of cardboard and a response to my anger of, "I'm sorry, I always ship comics that way and have never had a problem, look at my feedback". Total dishonesty and thievery. All to skim an extra dollar or two from shipping charges, IMO.![]()
![]()
![]()
If I had a dollar...no, a QUARTER....no, A PENNY for every time I heard the words "You're the first person that's ever had a problem" or a variation thereof...I'd be richer than Oprah. Maybe not Bill Gates, but definitely Oprah.
Ayup.Can you tell you touched a nerve.
This is more of the "whining" I've been accused of doing.
Some folks think I should just bend over and accept what is.
Where's the smiley for that......?
-
- Chief of the Dia Tribe
- Posts: 22415
- Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2004 8:55 pm
Yeah, it's pretty beyond ridiculous, and the *SQUEE* who try to suggest that it's the "eBay risk" and that it's YOUR fault that stuff is overgraded and mangled in shipping are the same types of asseclowns who suggest that it's a woman's fault she gets raped.GJB wrote:Well, I'm definitely in your corner. It's a mind crime that someone would try to convince you shipping is not their problem. You hear it enough, you start to question your own idea of right and wrong.ZephyrWasHOT!! wrote:GJB wrote:At least 50% of what I win on ebay falls into this category. There are some really good sellers, particularly from these boards, that do a great job of appreciating the books after they are sold and ship them accordingly.
Then you have the ones that don't care or lack common sense.
I've told sellers I will pay extra to secure my purchase. Then after no response to my offer, I receive a bent up book protected by one flimsy piece of cardboard and a response to my anger of, "I'm sorry, I always ship comics that way and have never had a problem, look at my feedback". Total dishonesty and thievery. All to skim an extra dollar or two from shipping charges, IMO.![]()
![]()
![]()
If I had a dollar...no, a QUARTER....no, A PENNY for every time I heard the words "You're the first person that's ever had a problem" or a variation thereof...I'd be richer than Oprah. Maybe not Bill Gates, but definitely Oprah.
Ayup.Can you tell you touched a nerve.
This is more of the "whining" I've been accused of doing.
Some folks think I should just bend over and accept what is.
Where's the smiley for that......?
Not willing to take responsibility for their actions, basically.
The answer is simple: if you sell a book in a specific grade, it should arrive in that specific grade. Period.
It's like "look, just don't LIE to me, just tell me what it is you have, and I can decide if I want it. I MAY be interested in what you have, at whatever grade it's in, IF you just don't LIE to me! And, then make SURE it ARRIVES to me in the condition promised!"
No excuses. You be a man and you do right by your customers....or you don't sell. It's beyond simple.
It boggles the mind....just boggles....that anyone would think that concept is controversial.
- DawgPhan
- My posts are simmered in four flavors
- Posts: 11553
- Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2004 8:17 am
- Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Does that mean that [edit, name removed] requested or just someone requested...greg wrote:[THIS TOPIC HAS BEEN EDITED]
Comments in violation of messageboard policies have been removed
by request from this topic. (Follow-up comments have also been removed,
not for policy violations, but because they are "remnants" of
the original violation, referring to it in quotes, etc.)
- greg
- The admin around here must be getting old and soft.
- Posts: 22887
- Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2004 9:39 am
- Valiant fan since: Rai #0
- Favorite character: Depends on title
- Favorite title: Depends on writer
- Favorite writer: Depends on artist
- Favorite artist: Depends on character
- Location: Indoors
- Contact:
It means the comments were removed by request.DawgPhan wrote:Does that mean that [edit, name removed] requested or just someone requested...greg wrote:[THIS TOPIC HAS BEEN EDITED]
Comments in violation of messageboard policies have been removed
by request from this topic. (Follow-up comments have also been removed,
not for policy violations, but because they are "remnants" of
the original violation, referring to it in quotes, etc.)
(Don't mention names when it's clear they've been removed on purpose.)
- DawgPhan
- My posts are simmered in four flavors
- Posts: 11553
- Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2004 8:17 am
- Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Is that another rule?greg wrote:It means the comments were removed by request.DawgPhan wrote:Does that mean that [edit, name removed] requested or just someone requested...greg wrote:[THIS TOPIC HAS BEEN EDITED]
Comments in violation of messageboard policies have been removed
by request from this topic. (Follow-up comments have also been removed,
not for policy violations, but because they are "remnants" of
the original violation, referring to it in quotes, etc.)
(Don't mention names when it's clear they've been removed on purpose.)
Oh and my bad...I thought for a second that someone else had requested it....like the person that started this thread...but then I noticed/relized that Zeph had started it and figured that he wouldnt do that...
but anyway...my bad...