Remember, Remember to watch V this weekend
Moderators: Daniel Jackson, greg
- Byrneout
- ...and in THIS corner...
- Posts: 2706
- Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2004 12:26 pm
- Location: Originally Hell's Kitchen, NY - *SKREE* that "Clinton, NY" *SKREE* - now Cincinnati, OH
Or.... viewtopic.php?t=9793Daniel Jackson wrote:I forgot to watch it. I'll have go and take a look at him in action.slym2none wrote:You didn't see the video where he was wearing the VALIANT tee? I'da guess 235 or so looking at that.
-slym
- depluto
- [custom level vored]
- Posts: 19520
- Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2004 1:38 pm
- Valiant fan since: Yes
- Favorite character: Yes
- Favorite title: Yes
- Favorite writer: Yes
- Location: Pluto Beach FL
I actually remember a little bit of anti-Bush stuff in one of those movies. I thought the second two were pretty stupid (hey machines are coming to kill us ... let's have a multicultural bongo rave for 20 minutes of this damned movie!) but there was some scene where Keanu was in front of a bunch of TVs and they talked about evil leadership (or something ... help me out if you remember) and right at that point the TVs showed a scowling Dubya. It was blatantly political and served no other purpose in the movie. I remember thinking "I wish those weirdos would leave that crap out of this."Byrneout wrote:Exactly. He had also mentioned that he knew The Matrix was anti-Bush, and that the Brothers W were out to get Bush.
But ... I'm all for pile-driving fat guys.
- Daniel Jackson
- A toast to the return of Valiant!
- Posts: 38007
- Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2004 8:33 pm
OK, just watched the whole thing. It was waaay at the end of the broadcast when I finally seen you talking to the camera. It was very cool to see you in action, especially with the black Valiant shirt on. Can't wait to see more. Is your partner coming out to help you on the next show?Byrneout wrote:Or.... viewtopic.php?t=9793Daniel Jackson wrote:I forgot to watch it. I'll have go and take a look at him in action.slym2none wrote:You didn't see the video where he was wearing the VALIANT tee? I'da guess 235 or so looking at that.
-slym
- slym2none
- a typical message board assassin
- Posts: 37119
- Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 12:08 pm
- Location: Troll- free zone.
You'll have to watch the PPV to find out!Daniel Jackson wrote:OK, just watched the whole thing. It was waaay at the end of the broadcast when I finally seen you talking to the camera. It was very cool to see you in action, especially with the black Valiant shirt on. Can't wait to see more. Is your partner coming out to help you on the next show?Byrneout wrote:Or.... viewtopic.php?t=9793Daniel Jackson wrote:I forgot to watch it. I'll have go and take a look at him in action.slym2none wrote:You didn't see the video where he was wearing the VALIANT tee? I'da guess 235 or so looking at that.
-slym
-slym
Some people spend their whole lives believing in fairy tales, usually because they don't want to give up the fabulous prizes.
-
- Chief of the Dia Tribe
- Posts: 22415
- Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2004 8:55 pm
Context....? What the hell is context....?X-O HoboJoe wrote:Good point, Moore is a damn fine writer and he hit a "universal" point with V for Vendetta. When someone's looking for something to bolster their own viewpoint or agenda, no amount of context will stop them.Heath wrote:Seriously though, the producers may be using this story as anti-Bush propoganda, but that doesn't mean it is and it doesn't lessen my anticipation for it. I loved the comic and I have high hopes for the film. (But, I never manage to make it to the theatre, so I'll probably see it a year or two after it is released on DVD. I still haven't seen Sin City, for crying out loud, and only recently saw Hellboy!!)
The theme is universal. "People shouldn't be afraid of their government. Government should be afraid of the people." I read an interview with Natalie Portman and she mentioned Joel Silver talking to a reporter from South Korea who was convinced the movie was about North Korea. Some people - on either end of the political spectrum - will be convinced it's about Bush. Some people are just a little insane too.
- Todd Luck
- Doomed to forever roam the black halls
- Posts: 4729
- Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2004 1:02 pm
- Location: Winston-Salem, NC
I just got back from seeing it. Good movie. The comics a lot better. It's impossible to capture the amount of depth in the VERY long comic story in a two hour plus movie. Plus there were two major changes that really did alter the story and themes of the comic in ways that detracted from the movie as an adaption. I'll discuss those in the V thread on the movie/TV forum when I get a chance. Still, mainly very faithful, very good stuff.
A great review from the movie thread that I wanted to post in the general forum.architect wrote:So I went last night and if you have read the graphic novel recently, you will not be let down. I believe this to be the greatest comic book movie ever done. It was beautiful, compelling and moving. Once it was said and done, the theater of 100 people started clapping and this was the late show.
If you haven't read it, you may love it even more. It might possibly be the best movie I have ever seen.
Do yourself a favor, go see it this weekend. I will be watching it again on sunday. I have never seen a movie in the theater twice, but this one I will be watching a few more times.
-j
- slym2none
- a typical message board assassin
- Posts: 37119
- Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 12:08 pm
- Location: Troll- free zone.
Steverino, are you calling yourself an idiot?steverino wrote:this movie is nothing but anti-Bush propogandaByrneout wrote:Just so long as I don't have to hear one more idiot go "this movie is nothing but anti-Bush propoganda", I intend to see it this Sunday.
-slym
Some people spend their whole lives believing in fairy tales, usually because they don't want to give up the fabulous prizes.
- Daniel Jackson
- A toast to the return of Valiant!
- Posts: 38007
- Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2004 8:33 pm
I think he wants Ric to put him through a table....slym2none wrote:Steverino, are you calling yourself an idiot?steverino wrote:this movie is nothing but anti-Bush propogandaByrneout wrote:Just so long as I don't have to hear one more idiot go "this movie is nothing but anti-Bush propoganda", I intend to see it this Sunday.
-slym
- slym2none
- a typical message board assassin
- Posts: 37119
- Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 12:08 pm
- Location: Troll- free zone.
Kinda what I was thinking.Daniel Jackson wrote:I think he wants Ric to put him through a table....slym2none wrote:Steverino, are you calling yourself an idiot?steverino wrote:this movie is nothing but anti-Bush propogandaByrneout wrote:Just so long as I don't have to hear one more idiot go "this movie is nothing but anti-Bush propoganda", I intend to see it this Sunday.
-slym
-slym
Some people spend their whole lives believing in fairy tales, usually because they don't want to give up the fabulous prizes.
- Daniel Jackson
- A toast to the return of Valiant!
- Posts: 38007
- Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2004 8:33 pm
That would make a great PPV!slym2none wrote:Kinda what I was thinking.Daniel Jackson wrote:I think he wants Ric to put him through a table....slym2none wrote:Steverino, are you calling yourself an idiot?steverino wrote:this movie is nothing but anti-Bush propogandaByrneout wrote:Just so long as I don't have to hear one more idiot go "this movie is nothing but anti-Bush propoganda", I intend to see it this Sunday.
-slym
-slym
-
- You gotta have Faith!
- Posts: 806
- Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2004 7:16 pm
WHY MOORE WAS WITH DC WHEN HE WAS STILL IRRITATED WITH THEM: America's Best Comics is connected with WILDSTORM, which Jim Lee had as part of Image. Moore made the deal with Lee when Wildstorm was still with Image, and didn't know about Wildstorm being sold to DC until later.SiBill wrote:Of course he claims to hate DC for "stealing" his book - but yet started ABC with them. How confusing is he?
I"m just trying to have fun. But I'm all for the PPV. LET ME AT HIM.Daniel Jackson wrote:That would make a great PPV!slym2none wrote:Kinda what I was thinking.Daniel Jackson wrote:I think he wants Ric to put him through a table....slym2none wrote:Steverino, are you calling yourself an idiot?steverino wrote:this movie is nothing but anti-Bush propogandaByrneout wrote:Just so long as I don't have to hear one more idiot go "this movie is nothing but anti-Bush propoganda", I intend to see it this Sunday.
-slym
-slym

[Steverino is the only man to take one of Chuck Norris's beard hairs, and live to tell about it. Course, it was a long recovery....]
-
- Chief of the Dia Tribe
- Posts: 22415
- Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2004 8:55 pm
Thanks Spidey...I was about to type all that, and saw your post instead. Thanks!The Spider wrote:WHY MOORE WAS WITH DC WHEN HE WAS STILL IRRITATED WITH THEM: America's Best Comics is connected with WILDSTORM, which Jim Lee had as part of Image. Moore made the deal with Lee when Wildstorm was still with Image, and didn't know about Wildstorm being sold to DC until later.SiBill wrote:Of course he claims to hate DC for "stealing" his book - but yet started ABC with them. How confusing is he?
And you know me...if I can avoid typing anything, I will.....

- Todd Luck
- Doomed to forever roam the black halls
- Posts: 4729
- Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2004 1:02 pm
- Location: Winston-Salem, NC
On why Moore was angry with DC and requested his name be removed from the film...
Moore's vendetta against V For Vendetta
New York Times, Petter Ricci, various AMFS fans
March 13, 2006
The online version of the New York Times contains an article on Alan Moore by Dave Itzkoff. The article covers Moore's career in comics, as well as his involvement and feelings overing film adaptations of his work, in particular, V For Vendetta.
Here are some excerpts:
Moore at DC
"Alan was one of the first writers of our generation, of great courage and great literary skill," said Paul Levitz, the president and publisher of DC Comics. "You could watch him stretching the boundaries of the medium."
But by 1989, Mr. Moore had severed his ties with DC. The publisher says he objected to its decision to label its adult-themed comics (including some of his own) as "Suggested for Mature Readers." Mr. Moore says he was objecting to language in his contracts that would give him back the rights to "Watchmen" and "V for Vendetta" when they went out of print — language that he says turned out to be meaningless, because DC never intended to stop reprinting either book. "I said, 'Fair enough,' " he recalls. " 'You have managed to successfully swindle me, and so I will never work for you again.' "
Mr. Levitz said that such so-called reversion clauses routinely appear in comic book contracts, and that DC has honored all of its obligations to Mr. Moore. "I don't think Alan was dissatisfied at the time," Mr. Levitz said. "I think he was dissatisfied several years later."
On consulting for the V For Vendetta film:
"I explained to [Larry Wachowski] that I'd had some bad experiences in Hollywood," Mr. Moore said. "I didn't want any input in it, didn't want to see it and didn't want to meet him to have coffee and talk about ideas for the film."
But at a press conference on March 4, 2005, to announce the start of production on the "V for Vendetta" film, the producer Joel Silver said Mr. Moore was "very excited about what Larry had to say and Larry sent the script, so we hope to see him sometime before we're in the U.K." This, Mr. Moore said, "was a flat lie."
"Given that I'd already published statements saying I wasn't interested in the film, it actually made me look duplicitous," he said.
Through his editors at DC Comics (like Warner Brothers, a subsidiary of Time Warner), Mr. Moore insisted that the studio publicly retract Mr. Silver's remarks. When no retraction was made, Mr. Moore once again quit his association with DC (and Wildstorm along with it), and demanded that his name be removed from the "V for Vendetta" film, as well as from any of his work that DC might reprint in the future.
The producers of "V for Vendetta" reluctantly agreed to strip Mr. Moore's name from the film's credits, a move that saddened Mr. Lloyd, who still endorses the film. "Alan and I were like Laurel and Hardy when we worked on that," Mr. Lloyd said. "We clicked. I felt bad about not seeing a credit for that team preserved, but there you go."
http://www.alanmoorefansite.com/news.html
That's a shame. It could've been an even better film with his input.
Plus the ads wouldn't have had that moronic tagline about the movie being a vision of the future from the Wachowski Brothers
Moore's vendetta against V For Vendetta
New York Times, Petter Ricci, various AMFS fans
March 13, 2006
The online version of the New York Times contains an article on Alan Moore by Dave Itzkoff. The article covers Moore's career in comics, as well as his involvement and feelings overing film adaptations of his work, in particular, V For Vendetta.
Here are some excerpts:
Moore at DC
"Alan was one of the first writers of our generation, of great courage and great literary skill," said Paul Levitz, the president and publisher of DC Comics. "You could watch him stretching the boundaries of the medium."
But by 1989, Mr. Moore had severed his ties with DC. The publisher says he objected to its decision to label its adult-themed comics (including some of his own) as "Suggested for Mature Readers." Mr. Moore says he was objecting to language in his contracts that would give him back the rights to "Watchmen" and "V for Vendetta" when they went out of print — language that he says turned out to be meaningless, because DC never intended to stop reprinting either book. "I said, 'Fair enough,' " he recalls. " 'You have managed to successfully swindle me, and so I will never work for you again.' "
Mr. Levitz said that such so-called reversion clauses routinely appear in comic book contracts, and that DC has honored all of its obligations to Mr. Moore. "I don't think Alan was dissatisfied at the time," Mr. Levitz said. "I think he was dissatisfied several years later."
On consulting for the V For Vendetta film:
"I explained to [Larry Wachowski] that I'd had some bad experiences in Hollywood," Mr. Moore said. "I didn't want any input in it, didn't want to see it and didn't want to meet him to have coffee and talk about ideas for the film."
But at a press conference on March 4, 2005, to announce the start of production on the "V for Vendetta" film, the producer Joel Silver said Mr. Moore was "very excited about what Larry had to say and Larry sent the script, so we hope to see him sometime before we're in the U.K." This, Mr. Moore said, "was a flat lie."
"Given that I'd already published statements saying I wasn't interested in the film, it actually made me look duplicitous," he said.
Through his editors at DC Comics (like Warner Brothers, a subsidiary of Time Warner), Mr. Moore insisted that the studio publicly retract Mr. Silver's remarks. When no retraction was made, Mr. Moore once again quit his association with DC (and Wildstorm along with it), and demanded that his name be removed from the "V for Vendetta" film, as well as from any of his work that DC might reprint in the future.
The producers of "V for Vendetta" reluctantly agreed to strip Mr. Moore's name from the film's credits, a move that saddened Mr. Lloyd, who still endorses the film. "Alan and I were like Laurel and Hardy when we worked on that," Mr. Lloyd said. "We clicked. I felt bad about not seeing a credit for that team preserved, but there you go."
http://www.alanmoorefansite.com/news.html
That's a shame. It could've been an even better film with his input.
Plus the ads wouldn't have had that moronic tagline about the movie being a vision of the future from the Wachowski Brothers

Jeez.Todd Luck wrote:On why Moore was angry with DC and requested his name be removed from the film...
Moore's vendetta against V For Vendetta
New York Times, Petter Ricci, various AMFS fans
March 13, 2006
The online version of the New York Times contains an article on Alan Moore by Dave Itzkoff. The article covers Moore's career in comics, as well as his involvement and feelings overing film adaptations of his work, in particular, V For Vendetta.
Here are some excerpts:
Moore at DC
"Alan was one of the first writers of our generation, of great courage and great literary skill," said Paul Levitz, the president and publisher of DC Comics. "You could watch him stretching the boundaries of the medium."
But by 1989, Mr. Moore had severed his ties with DC. The publisher says he objected to its decision to label its adult-themed comics (including some of his own) as "Suggested for Mature Readers." Mr. Moore says he was objecting to language in his contracts that would give him back the rights to "Watchmen" and "V for Vendetta" when they went out of print — language that he says turned out to be meaningless, because DC never intended to stop reprinting either book. "I said, 'Fair enough,' " he recalls. " 'You have managed to successfully swindle me, and so I will never work for you again.' "
Mr. Levitz said that such so-called reversion clauses routinely appear in comic book contracts, and that DC has honored all of its obligations to Mr. Moore. "I don't think Alan was dissatisfied at the time," Mr. Levitz said. "I think he was dissatisfied several years later."
On consulting for the V For Vendetta film:
"I explained to [Larry Wachowski] that I'd had some bad experiences in Hollywood," Mr. Moore said. "I didn't want any input in it, didn't want to see it and didn't want to meet him to have coffee and talk about ideas for the film."
But at a press conference on March 4, 2005, to announce the start of production on the "V for Vendetta" film, the producer Joel Silver said Mr. Moore was "very excited about what Larry had to say and Larry sent the script, so we hope to see him sometime before we're in the U.K." This, Mr. Moore said, "was a flat lie."
"Given that I'd already published statements saying I wasn't interested in the film, it actually made me look duplicitous," he said.
Through his editors at DC Comics (like Warner Brothers, a subsidiary of Time Warner), Mr. Moore insisted that the studio publicly retract Mr. Silver's remarks. When no retraction was made, Mr. Moore once again quit his association with DC (and Wildstorm along with it), and demanded that his name be removed from the "V for Vendetta" film, as well as from any of his work that DC might reprint in the future.
The producers of "V for Vendetta" reluctantly agreed to strip Mr. Moore's name from the film's credits, a move that saddened Mr. Lloyd, who still endorses the film. "Alan and I were like Laurel and Hardy when we worked on that," Mr. Lloyd said. "We clicked. I felt bad about not seeing a credit for that team preserved, but there you go."
http://www.alanmoorefansite.com/news.html
That's a shame. It could've been an even better film with his input.
Plus the ads wouldn't have had that moronic tagline about the movie being a vision of the future from the Wachowski Brothers

Sounds like Moore's ego could raise the Titanic.

Maybe we should should throw him in the sea and see if his head would double for a floatation device....with lot's of hair on it!


I am not a Moore fan.

- X-O HoboJoe
- Bradley is not unsupervised anymore.
- Posts: 22413
- Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2004 7:07 pm
- Valiant fan since: 1991
- Favorite character: Aric
- Favorite title: Shadowman
- Location: Adrift on the Seas of Fate
steverino wrote:Jeez.Todd Luck wrote:On why Moore was angry with DC and requested his name be removed from the film...
Moore's vendetta against V For Vendetta
New York Times, Petter Ricci, various AMFS fans
March 13, 2006
The online version of the New York Times contains an article on Alan Moore by Dave Itzkoff. The article covers Moore's career in comics, as well as his involvement and feelings overing film adaptations of his work, in particular, V For Vendetta.
Here are some excerpts:
Moore at DC
"Alan was one of the first writers of our generation, of great courage and great literary skill," said Paul Levitz, the president and publisher of DC Comics. "You could watch him stretching the boundaries of the medium."
But by 1989, Mr. Moore had severed his ties with DC. The publisher says he objected to its decision to label its adult-themed comics (including some of his own) as "Suggested for Mature Readers." Mr. Moore says he was objecting to language in his contracts that would give him back the rights to "Watchmen" and "V for Vendetta" when they went out of print — language that he says turned out to be meaningless, because DC never intended to stop reprinting either book. "I said, 'Fair enough,' " he recalls. " 'You have managed to successfully swindle me, and so I will never work for you again.' "
Mr. Levitz said that such so-called reversion clauses routinely appear in comic book contracts, and that DC has honored all of its obligations to Mr. Moore. "I don't think Alan was dissatisfied at the time," Mr. Levitz said. "I think he was dissatisfied several years later."
On consulting for the V For Vendetta film:
"I explained to [Larry Wachowski] that I'd had some bad experiences in Hollywood," Mr. Moore said. "I didn't want any input in it, didn't want to see it and didn't want to meet him to have coffee and talk about ideas for the film."
But at a press conference on March 4, 2005, to announce the start of production on the "V for Vendetta" film, the producer Joel Silver said Mr. Moore was "very excited about what Larry had to say and Larry sent the script, so we hope to see him sometime before we're in the U.K." This, Mr. Moore said, "was a flat lie."
"Given that I'd already published statements saying I wasn't interested in the film, it actually made me look duplicitous," he said.
Through his editors at DC Comics (like Warner Brothers, a subsidiary of Time Warner), Mr. Moore insisted that the studio publicly retract Mr. Silver's remarks. When no retraction was made, Mr. Moore once again quit his association with DC (and Wildstorm along with it), and demanded that his name be removed from the "V for Vendetta" film, as well as from any of his work that DC might reprint in the future.
The producers of "V for Vendetta" reluctantly agreed to strip Mr. Moore's name from the film's credits, a move that saddened Mr. Lloyd, who still endorses the film. "Alan and I were like Laurel and Hardy when we worked on that," Mr. Lloyd said. "We clicked. I felt bad about not seeing a credit for that team preserved, but there you go."
http://www.alanmoorefansite.com/news.html
That's a shame. It could've been an even better film with his input.
Plus the ads wouldn't have had that moronic tagline about the movie being a vision of the future from the Wachowski Brothers![]()
Sounds like Moore's ego could raise the Titanic.![]()
Maybe we should should throw him in the sea and see if his head would double for a floatation device....with lot's of hair on it!Just hope those poor squirrels living in his beard know how to swim.
![]()
I am not a Moore fan.

'Rino! Go easy on the squirrels, dude. They can't help where they live.
Alan is one intense guy, and reputed to be a decendant of Rasputin.
I DO NOT EAT, DRINK OR ABSORB SOULS, DAMMIT!
- myron
- I do embrace my inner geekdom
- Posts: 16286
- Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2004 10:37 am
- Valiant fan since: 1991
- Favorite character: Gilad
- Favorite title: Pre-Unity Harbinger
- Location: watertown, wi
since the only picture of him that we every is that charlie manson one, the rasputin thing might be trueX-O HoboJoe wrote:steverino wrote:Jeez.Todd Luck wrote:On why Moore was angry with DC and requested his name be removed from the film...
Moore's vendetta against V For Vendetta
New York Times, Petter Ricci, various AMFS fans
March 13, 2006
The online version of the New York Times contains an article on Alan Moore by Dave Itzkoff. The article covers Moore's career in comics, as well as his involvement and feelings overing film adaptations of his work, in particular, V For Vendetta.
Here are some excerpts:
Moore at DC
"Alan was one of the first writers of our generation, of great courage and great literary skill," said Paul Levitz, the president and publisher of DC Comics. "You could watch him stretching the boundaries of the medium."
But by 1989, Mr. Moore had severed his ties with DC. The publisher says he objected to its decision to label its adult-themed comics (including some of his own) as "Suggested for Mature Readers." Mr. Moore says he was objecting to language in his contracts that would give him back the rights to "Watchmen" and "V for Vendetta" when they went out of print — language that he says turned out to be meaningless, because DC never intended to stop reprinting either book. "I said, 'Fair enough,' " he recalls. " 'You have managed to successfully swindle me, and so I will never work for you again.' "
Mr. Levitz said that such so-called reversion clauses routinely appear in comic book contracts, and that DC has honored all of its obligations to Mr. Moore. "I don't think Alan was dissatisfied at the time," Mr. Levitz said. "I think he was dissatisfied several years later."
On consulting for the V For Vendetta film:
"I explained to [Larry Wachowski] that I'd had some bad experiences in Hollywood," Mr. Moore said. "I didn't want any input in it, didn't want to see it and didn't want to meet him to have coffee and talk about ideas for the film."
But at a press conference on March 4, 2005, to announce the start of production on the "V for Vendetta" film, the producer Joel Silver said Mr. Moore was "very excited about what Larry had to say and Larry sent the script, so we hope to see him sometime before we're in the U.K." This, Mr. Moore said, "was a flat lie."
"Given that I'd already published statements saying I wasn't interested in the film, it actually made me look duplicitous," he said.
Through his editors at DC Comics (like Warner Brothers, a subsidiary of Time Warner), Mr. Moore insisted that the studio publicly retract Mr. Silver's remarks. When no retraction was made, Mr. Moore once again quit his association with DC (and Wildstorm along with it), and demanded that his name be removed from the "V for Vendetta" film, as well as from any of his work that DC might reprint in the future.
The producers of "V for Vendetta" reluctantly agreed to strip Mr. Moore's name from the film's credits, a move that saddened Mr. Lloyd, who still endorses the film. "Alan and I were like Laurel and Hardy when we worked on that," Mr. Lloyd said. "We clicked. I felt bad about not seeing a credit for that team preserved, but there you go."
http://www.alanmoorefansite.com/news.html
That's a shame. It could've been an even better film with his input.
Plus the ads wouldn't have had that moronic tagline about the movie being a vision of the future from the Wachowski Brothers![]()
Sounds like Moore's ego could raise the Titanic.![]()
Maybe we should should throw him in the sea and see if his head would double for a floatation device....with lot's of hair on it!Just hope those poor squirrels living in his beard know how to swim.
![]()
I am not a Moore fan.![]()
'Rino! Go easy on the squirrels, dude. They can't help where they live.
Alan is one intense guy, and reputed to be a decendant of Rasputin.

Why waste time learning, when ignorance is instantaneous?
Found a picture of one of the squirrels currently residing within Moore's beard:X-O HoboJoe wrote:steverino wrote: Jeez.![]()
Sounds like Moore's ego could raise the Titanic.![]()
Maybe we should should throw him in the sea and see if his head would double for a floatation device....with lot's of hair on it!Just hope those poor squirrels living in his beard know how to swim.
![]()
I am not a Moore fan.![]()
'Rino! Go easy on the squirrels, dude. They can't help where they live.
Alan is one intense guy, and reputed to be a decendant of Rasputin.




- X-O HoboJoe
- Bradley is not unsupervised anymore.
- Posts: 22413
- Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2004 7:07 pm
- Valiant fan since: 1991
- Favorite character: Aric
- Favorite title: Shadowman
- Location: Adrift on the Seas of Fate
That one's gonna be in the sequel: V for Vaginasteverino wrote:Found a picture of one of the squirrels currently residing within Moore's beard:X-O HoboJoe wrote:steverino wrote: Jeez.![]()
Sounds like Moore's ego could raise the Titanic.![]()
Maybe we should should throw him in the sea and see if his head would double for a floatation device....with lot's of hair on it!Just hope those poor squirrels living in his beard know how to swim.
![]()
I am not a Moore fan.![]()
'Rino! Go easy on the squirrels, dude. They can't help where they live.
Alan is one intense guy, and reputed to be a decendant of Rasputin.
![]()
![]()
I DO NOT EAT, DRINK OR ABSORB SOULS, DAMMIT!
- Daniel Jackson
- A toast to the return of Valiant!
- Posts: 38007
- Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2004 8:33 pm
- Daniel Jackson
- A toast to the return of Valiant!
- Posts: 38007
- Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2004 8:33 pm