Remember, Remember to watch V this weekend

Discuss the VALIANT comics, characters, and collecting.
PLEASE DO NOT REVEAL SPOILER INFORMATION IN YOUR TOPIC TITLE.

Moderators: Daniel Jackson, greg

When will you watch V for Vendetta?

Opening Weekend
8
29%
Sometime in Theaters
7
25%
On DVD
12
43%
On TV
0
No votes
Never
1
4%
 
Total votes: 28

User avatar
Byrneout
...and in THIS corner...
...and in THIS corner...
Posts: 2706
Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2004 12:26 pm
Location: Originally Hell's Kitchen, NY - *SKREE* that "Clinton, NY" *SKREE* - now Cincinnati, OH

Post by Byrneout »

slym2none wrote:You didn't see the video where he was wearing the VALIANT tee? I'da guess 235 or so looking at that.



-slym
Again, I'm flattered - but I was about 264 at that point.

User avatar
Byrneout
...and in THIS corner...
...and in THIS corner...
Posts: 2706
Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2004 12:26 pm
Location: Originally Hell's Kitchen, NY - *SKREE* that "Clinton, NY" *SKREE* - now Cincinnati, OH

Post by Byrneout »

Daniel Jackson wrote:
slym2none wrote:You didn't see the video where he was wearing the VALIANT tee? I'da guess 235 or so looking at that.



-slym
I forgot to watch it. I'll have go and take a look at him in action.
Or.... viewtopic.php?t=9793

User avatar
depluto
[custom level vored]
[custom level vored]
Posts: 19520
Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2004 1:38 pm
Valiant fan since: Yes
Favorite character: Yes
Favorite title: Yes
Favorite writer: Yes
Location: Pluto Beach FL

Post by depluto »

Byrneout wrote:Exactly. He had also mentioned that he knew The Matrix was anti-Bush, and that the Brothers W were out to get Bush.
I actually remember a little bit of anti-Bush stuff in one of those movies. I thought the second two were pretty stupid (hey machines are coming to kill us ... let's have a multicultural bongo rave for 20 minutes of this damned movie!) but there was some scene where Keanu was in front of a bunch of TVs and they talked about evil leadership (or something ... help me out if you remember) and right at that point the TVs showed a scowling Dubya. It was blatantly political and served no other purpose in the movie. I remember thinking "I wish those weirdos would leave that crap out of this."

But ... I'm all for pile-driving fat guys.

User avatar
Daniel Jackson
A toast to the return of Valiant!
A toast to the return of Valiant!
Posts: 38007
Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2004 8:33 pm

Post by Daniel Jackson »

Byrneout wrote:
Daniel Jackson wrote:
slym2none wrote:You didn't see the video where he was wearing the VALIANT tee? I'da guess 235 or so looking at that.



-slym
I forgot to watch it. I'll have go and take a look at him in action.
Or.... viewtopic.php?t=9793
OK, just watched the whole thing. It was waaay at the end of the broadcast when I finally seen you talking to the camera. It was very cool to see you in action, especially with the black Valiant shirt on. Can't wait to see more. Is your partner coming out to help you on the next show?

User avatar
slym2none
a typical message board assassin
a typical message board assassin
Posts: 37119
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 12:08 pm
Location: Troll- free zone.

Post by slym2none »

Daniel Jackson wrote:
Byrneout wrote:
Daniel Jackson wrote:
slym2none wrote:You didn't see the video where he was wearing the VALIANT tee? I'da guess 235 or so looking at that.



-slym
I forgot to watch it. I'll have go and take a look at him in action.
Or.... viewtopic.php?t=9793
OK, just watched the whole thing. It was waaay at the end of the broadcast when I finally seen you talking to the camera. It was very cool to see you in action, especially with the black Valiant shirt on. Can't wait to see more. Is your partner coming out to help you on the next show?
You'll have to watch the PPV to find out!



-slym
Some people spend their whole lives believing in fairy tales, usually because they don't want to give up the fabulous prizes.

ZephyrWasHOT!!
Chief of the Dia Tribe
Chief of the Dia Tribe
Posts: 22415
Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2004 8:55 pm

Post by ZephyrWasHOT!! »

X-O HoboJoe wrote:
Heath wrote:Seriously though, the producers may be using this story as anti-Bush propoganda, but that doesn't mean it is and it doesn't lessen my anticipation for it. I loved the comic and I have high hopes for the film. (But, I never manage to make it to the theatre, so I'll probably see it a year or two after it is released on DVD. I still haven't seen Sin City, for crying out loud, and only recently saw Hellboy!!)

The theme is universal. "People shouldn't be afraid of their government. Government should be afraid of the people." I read an interview with Natalie Portman and she mentioned Joel Silver talking to a reporter from South Korea who was convinced the movie was about North Korea. Some people - on either end of the political spectrum - will be convinced it's about Bush. Some people are just a little insane too. :)
Good point, Moore is a damn fine writer and he hit a "universal" point with V for Vendetta. When someone's looking for something to bolster their own viewpoint or agenda, no amount of context will stop them.
Context....? What the hell is context....?

User avatar
Todd Luck
Doomed to forever roam the black halls
Doomed to forever roam the black halls
Posts: 4729
Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2004 1:02 pm
Location: Winston-Salem, NC

Post by Todd Luck »

I just got back from seeing it. Good movie. The comics a lot better. It's impossible to capture the amount of depth in the VERY long comic story in a two hour plus movie. Plus there were two major changes that really did alter the story and themes of the comic in ways that detracted from the movie as an adaption. I'll discuss those in the V thread on the movie/TV forum when I get a chance. Still, mainly very faithful, very good stuff.

User avatar
xoken
H.A.R.D.E.R. Corps, with Extra Resistance
H.A.R.D.E.R. Corps, with Extra Resistance
Posts: 1071
Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2005 3:04 pm

Post by xoken »

architect wrote:So I went last night and if you have read the graphic novel recently, you will not be let down. I believe this to be the greatest comic book movie ever done. It was beautiful, compelling and moving. Once it was said and done, the theater of 100 people started clapping and this was the late show.

If you haven't read it, you may love it even more. It might possibly be the best movie I have ever seen.

Do yourself a favor, go see it this weekend. I will be watching it again on sunday. I have never seen a movie in the theater twice, but this one I will be watching a few more times.

-j
A great review from the movie thread that I wanted to post in the general forum.

steverino
Account deactivated by administrator.
Posts: 5504
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 3:26 am

Post by steverino »

Byrneout wrote:Just so long as I don't have to hear one more idiot go "this movie is nothing but anti-Bush propoganda", I intend to see it this Sunday.

And if so much as one person says that in the theater... it will *not* be pretty. At all.
this movie is nothing but anti-Bush propoganda :thumb:

User avatar
slym2none
a typical message board assassin
a typical message board assassin
Posts: 37119
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 12:08 pm
Location: Troll- free zone.

Post by slym2none »

steverino wrote:
Byrneout wrote:Just so long as I don't have to hear one more idiot go "this movie is nothing but anti-Bush propoganda", I intend to see it this Sunday.
this movie is nothing but anti-Bush propoganda :thumb:
Steverino, are you calling yourself an idiot?



-slym
Some people spend their whole lives believing in fairy tales, usually because they don't want to give up the fabulous prizes.

User avatar
Daniel Jackson
A toast to the return of Valiant!
A toast to the return of Valiant!
Posts: 38007
Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2004 8:33 pm

Post by Daniel Jackson »

slym2none wrote:
steverino wrote:
Byrneout wrote:Just so long as I don't have to hear one more idiot go "this movie is nothing but anti-Bush propoganda", I intend to see it this Sunday.
this movie is nothing but anti-Bush propoganda :thumb:
Steverino, are you calling yourself an idiot?



-slym
I think he wants Ric to put him through a table....

User avatar
slym2none
a typical message board assassin
a typical message board assassin
Posts: 37119
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 12:08 pm
Location: Troll- free zone.

Post by slym2none »

Daniel Jackson wrote:
slym2none wrote:
steverino wrote:
Byrneout wrote:Just so long as I don't have to hear one more idiot go "this movie is nothing but anti-Bush propoganda", I intend to see it this Sunday.
this movie is nothing but anti-Bush propoganda :thumb:
Steverino, are you calling yourself an idiot?



-slym
I think he wants Ric to put him through a table....
Kinda what I was thinking.



-slym
Some people spend their whole lives believing in fairy tales, usually because they don't want to give up the fabulous prizes.

User avatar
Daniel Jackson
A toast to the return of Valiant!
A toast to the return of Valiant!
Posts: 38007
Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2004 8:33 pm

Post by Daniel Jackson »

slym2none wrote:
Daniel Jackson wrote:
slym2none wrote:
steverino wrote:
Byrneout wrote:Just so long as I don't have to hear one more idiot go "this movie is nothing but anti-Bush propoganda", I intend to see it this Sunday.
this movie is nothing but anti-Bush propoganda :thumb:
Steverino, are you calling yourself an idiot?



-slym
I think he wants Ric to put him through a table....
Kinda what I was thinking.



-slym
That would make a great PPV!

The Spider
You gotta have Faith!
You gotta have Faith!
Posts: 806
Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2004 7:16 pm

Post by The Spider »

SiBill wrote:Of course he claims to hate DC for "stealing" his book - but yet started ABC with them. How confusing is he?
WHY MOORE WAS WITH DC WHEN HE WAS STILL IRRITATED WITH THEM: America's Best Comics is connected with WILDSTORM, which Jim Lee had as part of Image. Moore made the deal with Lee when Wildstorm was still with Image, and didn't know about Wildstorm being sold to DC until later.

steverino
Account deactivated by administrator.
Posts: 5504
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 3:26 am

Post by steverino »

Daniel Jackson wrote:
slym2none wrote:
Daniel Jackson wrote:
slym2none wrote:
steverino wrote:
Byrneout wrote:Just so long as I don't have to hear one more idiot go "this movie is nothing but anti-Bush propoganda", I intend to see it this Sunday.
this movie is nothing but anti-Bush propoganda :thumb:
Steverino, are you calling yourself an idiot?



-slym
I think he wants Ric to put him through a table....
Kinda what I was thinking.



-slym
That would make a great PPV!
I"m just trying to have fun. But I'm all for the PPV. LET ME AT HIM. :kidaround:

[Steverino is the only man to take one of Chuck Norris's beard hairs, and live to tell about it. Course, it was a long recovery....]

ZephyrWasHOT!!
Chief of the Dia Tribe
Chief of the Dia Tribe
Posts: 22415
Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2004 8:55 pm

Post by ZephyrWasHOT!! »

The Spider wrote:
SiBill wrote:Of course he claims to hate DC for "stealing" his book - but yet started ABC with them. How confusing is he?
WHY MOORE WAS WITH DC WHEN HE WAS STILL IRRITATED WITH THEM: America's Best Comics is connected with WILDSTORM, which Jim Lee had as part of Image. Moore made the deal with Lee when Wildstorm was still with Image, and didn't know about Wildstorm being sold to DC until later.
Thanks Spidey...I was about to type all that, and saw your post instead. Thanks!

And you know me...if I can avoid typing anything, I will.....

:thumb:

User avatar
Todd Luck
Doomed to forever roam the black halls
Doomed to forever roam the black halls
Posts: 4729
Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2004 1:02 pm
Location: Winston-Salem, NC

Post by Todd Luck »

On why Moore was angry with DC and requested his name be removed from the film...

Moore's vendetta against V For Vendetta
New York Times, Petter Ricci, various AMFS fans
March 13, 2006

The online version of the New York Times contains an article on Alan Moore by Dave Itzkoff. The article covers Moore's career in comics, as well as his involvement and feelings overing film adaptations of his work, in particular, V For Vendetta.

Here are some excerpts:

Moore at DC

"Alan was one of the first writers of our generation, of great courage and great literary skill," said Paul Levitz, the president and publisher of DC Comics. "You could watch him stretching the boundaries of the medium."

But by 1989, Mr. Moore had severed his ties with DC. The publisher says he objected to its decision to label its adult-themed comics (including some of his own) as "Suggested for Mature Readers." Mr. Moore says he was objecting to language in his contracts that would give him back the rights to "Watchmen" and "V for Vendetta" when they went out of print — language that he says turned out to be meaningless, because DC never intended to stop reprinting either book. "I said, 'Fair enough,' " he recalls. " 'You have managed to successfully swindle me, and so I will never work for you again.' "

Mr. Levitz said that such so-called reversion clauses routinely appear in comic book contracts, and that DC has honored all of its obligations to Mr. Moore. "I don't think Alan was dissatisfied at the time," Mr. Levitz said. "I think he was dissatisfied several years later."

On consulting for the V For Vendetta film:

"I explained to [Larry Wachowski] that I'd had some bad experiences in Hollywood," Mr. Moore said. "I didn't want any input in it, didn't want to see it and didn't want to meet him to have coffee and talk about ideas for the film."

But at a press conference on March 4, 2005, to announce the start of production on the "V for Vendetta" film, the producer Joel Silver said Mr. Moore was "very excited about what Larry had to say and Larry sent the script, so we hope to see him sometime before we're in the U.K." This, Mr. Moore said, "was a flat lie."

"Given that I'd already published statements saying I wasn't interested in the film, it actually made me look duplicitous," he said.

Through his editors at DC Comics (like Warner Brothers, a subsidiary of Time Warner), Mr. Moore insisted that the studio publicly retract Mr. Silver's remarks. When no retraction was made, Mr. Moore once again quit his association with DC (and Wildstorm along with it), and demanded that his name be removed from the "V for Vendetta" film, as well as from any of his work that DC might reprint in the future.

The producers of "V for Vendetta" reluctantly agreed to strip Mr. Moore's name from the film's credits, a move that saddened Mr. Lloyd, who still endorses the film. "Alan and I were like Laurel and Hardy when we worked on that," Mr. Lloyd said. "We clicked. I felt bad about not seeing a credit for that team preserved, but there you go."


http://www.alanmoorefansite.com/news.html

That's a shame. It could've been an even better film with his input.

Plus the ads wouldn't have had that moronic tagline about the movie being a vision of the future from the Wachowski Brothers :roll:

steverino
Account deactivated by administrator.
Posts: 5504
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 3:26 am

Post by steverino »

Todd Luck wrote:On why Moore was angry with DC and requested his name be removed from the film...

Moore's vendetta against V For Vendetta
New York Times, Petter Ricci, various AMFS fans
March 13, 2006

The online version of the New York Times contains an article on Alan Moore by Dave Itzkoff. The article covers Moore's career in comics, as well as his involvement and feelings overing film adaptations of his work, in particular, V For Vendetta.

Here are some excerpts:

Moore at DC

"Alan was one of the first writers of our generation, of great courage and great literary skill," said Paul Levitz, the president and publisher of DC Comics. "You could watch him stretching the boundaries of the medium."

But by 1989, Mr. Moore had severed his ties with DC. The publisher says he objected to its decision to label its adult-themed comics (including some of his own) as "Suggested for Mature Readers." Mr. Moore says he was objecting to language in his contracts that would give him back the rights to "Watchmen" and "V for Vendetta" when they went out of print — language that he says turned out to be meaningless, because DC never intended to stop reprinting either book. "I said, 'Fair enough,' " he recalls. " 'You have managed to successfully swindle me, and so I will never work for you again.' "

Mr. Levitz said that such so-called reversion clauses routinely appear in comic book contracts, and that DC has honored all of its obligations to Mr. Moore. "I don't think Alan was dissatisfied at the time," Mr. Levitz said. "I think he was dissatisfied several years later."

On consulting for the V For Vendetta film:

"I explained to [Larry Wachowski] that I'd had some bad experiences in Hollywood," Mr. Moore said. "I didn't want any input in it, didn't want to see it and didn't want to meet him to have coffee and talk about ideas for the film."

But at a press conference on March 4, 2005, to announce the start of production on the "V for Vendetta" film, the producer Joel Silver said Mr. Moore was "very excited about what Larry had to say and Larry sent the script, so we hope to see him sometime before we're in the U.K." This, Mr. Moore said, "was a flat lie."

"Given that I'd already published statements saying I wasn't interested in the film, it actually made me look duplicitous," he said.

Through his editors at DC Comics (like Warner Brothers, a subsidiary of Time Warner), Mr. Moore insisted that the studio publicly retract Mr. Silver's remarks. When no retraction was made, Mr. Moore once again quit his association with DC (and Wildstorm along with it), and demanded that his name be removed from the "V for Vendetta" film, as well as from any of his work that DC might reprint in the future.

The producers of "V for Vendetta" reluctantly agreed to strip Mr. Moore's name from the film's credits, a move that saddened Mr. Lloyd, who still endorses the film. "Alan and I were like Laurel and Hardy when we worked on that," Mr. Lloyd said. "We clicked. I felt bad about not seeing a credit for that team preserved, but there you go."


http://www.alanmoorefansite.com/news.html

That's a shame. It could've been an even better film with his input.

Plus the ads wouldn't have had that moronic tagline about the movie being a vision of the future from the Wachowski Brothers :roll:
Jeez. :o

Sounds like Moore's ego could raise the Titanic. :roll:

Maybe we should should throw him in the sea and see if his head would double for a floatation device....with lot's of hair on it! :twisted: Just hope those poor squirrels living in his beard know how to swim. :?

I am not a Moore fan. :thumb:

User avatar
X-O HoboJoe
Bradley is not unsupervised anymore.
Bradley is not unsupervised anymore.
Posts: 22413
Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2004 7:07 pm
Valiant fan since: 1991
Favorite character: Aric
Favorite title: Shadowman
Location: Adrift on the Seas of Fate

Post by X-O HoboJoe »

steverino wrote:
Todd Luck wrote:On why Moore was angry with DC and requested his name be removed from the film...

Moore's vendetta against V For Vendetta
New York Times, Petter Ricci, various AMFS fans
March 13, 2006

The online version of the New York Times contains an article on Alan Moore by Dave Itzkoff. The article covers Moore's career in comics, as well as his involvement and feelings overing film adaptations of his work, in particular, V For Vendetta.

Here are some excerpts:

Moore at DC

"Alan was one of the first writers of our generation, of great courage and great literary skill," said Paul Levitz, the president and publisher of DC Comics. "You could watch him stretching the boundaries of the medium."

But by 1989, Mr. Moore had severed his ties with DC. The publisher says he objected to its decision to label its adult-themed comics (including some of his own) as "Suggested for Mature Readers." Mr. Moore says he was objecting to language in his contracts that would give him back the rights to "Watchmen" and "V for Vendetta" when they went out of print — language that he says turned out to be meaningless, because DC never intended to stop reprinting either book. "I said, 'Fair enough,' " he recalls. " 'You have managed to successfully swindle me, and so I will never work for you again.' "

Mr. Levitz said that such so-called reversion clauses routinely appear in comic book contracts, and that DC has honored all of its obligations to Mr. Moore. "I don't think Alan was dissatisfied at the time," Mr. Levitz said. "I think he was dissatisfied several years later."

On consulting for the V For Vendetta film:

"I explained to [Larry Wachowski] that I'd had some bad experiences in Hollywood," Mr. Moore said. "I didn't want any input in it, didn't want to see it and didn't want to meet him to have coffee and talk about ideas for the film."

But at a press conference on March 4, 2005, to announce the start of production on the "V for Vendetta" film, the producer Joel Silver said Mr. Moore was "very excited about what Larry had to say and Larry sent the script, so we hope to see him sometime before we're in the U.K." This, Mr. Moore said, "was a flat lie."

"Given that I'd already published statements saying I wasn't interested in the film, it actually made me look duplicitous," he said.

Through his editors at DC Comics (like Warner Brothers, a subsidiary of Time Warner), Mr. Moore insisted that the studio publicly retract Mr. Silver's remarks. When no retraction was made, Mr. Moore once again quit his association with DC (and Wildstorm along with it), and demanded that his name be removed from the "V for Vendetta" film, as well as from any of his work that DC might reprint in the future.

The producers of "V for Vendetta" reluctantly agreed to strip Mr. Moore's name from the film's credits, a move that saddened Mr. Lloyd, who still endorses the film. "Alan and I were like Laurel and Hardy when we worked on that," Mr. Lloyd said. "We clicked. I felt bad about not seeing a credit for that team preserved, but there you go."


http://www.alanmoorefansite.com/news.html

That's a shame. It could've been an even better film with his input.

Plus the ads wouldn't have had that moronic tagline about the movie being a vision of the future from the Wachowski Brothers :roll:
Jeez. :o

Sounds like Moore's ego could raise the Titanic. :roll:

Maybe we should should throw him in the sea and see if his head would double for a floatation device....with lot's of hair on it! :twisted: Just hope those poor squirrels living in his beard know how to swim. :?

I am not a Moore fan. :thumb:
:lol:
'Rino! Go easy on the squirrels, dude. They can't help where they live.
Alan is one intense guy, and reputed to be a decendant of Rasputin.
I DO NOT EAT, DRINK OR ABSORB SOULS, DAMMIT!

User avatar
myron
I do embrace my inner geekdom
I do embrace my inner geekdom
Posts: 16286
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2004 10:37 am
Valiant fan since: 1991
Favorite character: Gilad
Favorite title: Pre-Unity Harbinger
Location: watertown, wi

Post by myron »

X-O HoboJoe wrote:
steverino wrote:
Todd Luck wrote:On why Moore was angry with DC and requested his name be removed from the film...

Moore's vendetta against V For Vendetta
New York Times, Petter Ricci, various AMFS fans
March 13, 2006

The online version of the New York Times contains an article on Alan Moore by Dave Itzkoff. The article covers Moore's career in comics, as well as his involvement and feelings overing film adaptations of his work, in particular, V For Vendetta.

Here are some excerpts:

Moore at DC

"Alan was one of the first writers of our generation, of great courage and great literary skill," said Paul Levitz, the president and publisher of DC Comics. "You could watch him stretching the boundaries of the medium."

But by 1989, Mr. Moore had severed his ties with DC. The publisher says he objected to its decision to label its adult-themed comics (including some of his own) as "Suggested for Mature Readers." Mr. Moore says he was objecting to language in his contracts that would give him back the rights to "Watchmen" and "V for Vendetta" when they went out of print — language that he says turned out to be meaningless, because DC never intended to stop reprinting either book. "I said, 'Fair enough,' " he recalls. " 'You have managed to successfully swindle me, and so I will never work for you again.' "

Mr. Levitz said that such so-called reversion clauses routinely appear in comic book contracts, and that DC has honored all of its obligations to Mr. Moore. "I don't think Alan was dissatisfied at the time," Mr. Levitz said. "I think he was dissatisfied several years later."

On consulting for the V For Vendetta film:

"I explained to [Larry Wachowski] that I'd had some bad experiences in Hollywood," Mr. Moore said. "I didn't want any input in it, didn't want to see it and didn't want to meet him to have coffee and talk about ideas for the film."

But at a press conference on March 4, 2005, to announce the start of production on the "V for Vendetta" film, the producer Joel Silver said Mr. Moore was "very excited about what Larry had to say and Larry sent the script, so we hope to see him sometime before we're in the U.K." This, Mr. Moore said, "was a flat lie."

"Given that I'd already published statements saying I wasn't interested in the film, it actually made me look duplicitous," he said.

Through his editors at DC Comics (like Warner Brothers, a subsidiary of Time Warner), Mr. Moore insisted that the studio publicly retract Mr. Silver's remarks. When no retraction was made, Mr. Moore once again quit his association with DC (and Wildstorm along with it), and demanded that his name be removed from the "V for Vendetta" film, as well as from any of his work that DC might reprint in the future.

The producers of "V for Vendetta" reluctantly agreed to strip Mr. Moore's name from the film's credits, a move that saddened Mr. Lloyd, who still endorses the film. "Alan and I were like Laurel and Hardy when we worked on that," Mr. Lloyd said. "We clicked. I felt bad about not seeing a credit for that team preserved, but there you go."


http://www.alanmoorefansite.com/news.html

That's a shame. It could've been an even better film with his input.

Plus the ads wouldn't have had that moronic tagline about the movie being a vision of the future from the Wachowski Brothers :roll:
Jeez. :o

Sounds like Moore's ego could raise the Titanic. :roll:

Maybe we should should throw him in the sea and see if his head would double for a floatation device....with lot's of hair on it! :twisted: Just hope those poor squirrels living in his beard know how to swim. :?

I am not a Moore fan. :thumb:
:lol:
'Rino! Go easy on the squirrels, dude. They can't help where they live.
Alan is one intense guy, and reputed to be a decendant of Rasputin.
since the only picture of him that we every is that charlie manson one, the rasputin thing might be true :wink:
Why waste time learning, when ignorance is instantaneous?

steverino
Account deactivated by administrator.
Posts: 5504
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 3:26 am

Post by steverino »

X-O HoboJoe wrote:
steverino wrote: Jeez. :o

Sounds like Moore's ego could raise the Titanic. :roll:

Maybe we should should throw him in the sea and see if his head would double for a floatation device....with lot's of hair on it! :twisted: Just hope those poor squirrels living in his beard know how to swim. :?

I am not a Moore fan. :thumb:
:lol:
'Rino! Go easy on the squirrels, dude. They can't help where they live.
Alan is one intense guy, and reputed to be a decendant of Rasputin.
Found a picture of one of the squirrels currently residing within Moore's beard:

Image

:o :o :o

User avatar
X-O HoboJoe
Bradley is not unsupervised anymore.
Bradley is not unsupervised anymore.
Posts: 22413
Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2004 7:07 pm
Valiant fan since: 1991
Favorite character: Aric
Favorite title: Shadowman
Location: Adrift on the Seas of Fate

Post by X-O HoboJoe »

steverino wrote:
X-O HoboJoe wrote:
steverino wrote: Jeez. :o

Sounds like Moore's ego could raise the Titanic. :roll:

Maybe we should should throw him in the sea and see if his head would double for a floatation device....with lot's of hair on it! :twisted: Just hope those poor squirrels living in his beard know how to swim. :?

I am not a Moore fan. :thumb:
:lol:
'Rino! Go easy on the squirrels, dude. They can't help where they live.
Alan is one intense guy, and reputed to be a decendant of Rasputin.
Found a picture of one of the squirrels currently residing within Moore's beard:

Image

:o :o :o
That one's gonna be in the sequel: V for Vagina
I DO NOT EAT, DRINK OR ABSORB SOULS, DAMMIT!

User avatar
Daniel Jackson
A toast to the return of Valiant!
A toast to the return of Valiant!
Posts: 38007
Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2004 8:33 pm

Post by Daniel Jackson »

Man, I'll bet that squirrel is a big hit with the lady squirrels.

User avatar
Technique
Thatched Roof Cottages!!!
Thatched Roof Cottages!!!
Posts: 5238
Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2004 1:16 am
Location: The S is for Sucks

Post by Technique »

Daniel Jackson wrote:Man, I'll bet that squirrel is a big hit with the lady squirrels.
Slym is going to be SOOOO jealous...

User avatar
Daniel Jackson
A toast to the return of Valiant!
A toast to the return of Valiant!
Posts: 38007
Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2004 8:33 pm

Post by Daniel Jackson »

Technique wrote:
Daniel Jackson wrote:Man, I'll bet that squirrel is a big hit with the lady squirrels.
Slym is going to be SOOOO jealous...
Hahaha... ya think?


Post Reply