What Valiant book would you not want to return?
Moderators: Daniel Jackson, greg
- xodacia81
- Here I am, happy as a clam
- Posts: 18404
- Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2007 10:09 pm
- Location: East of Chicago, West of New York
Let's see...I think H.Corps would not be bad, because if there is no HC, then no PsiLords. I like this, although I enjoyed H.A.R.D Corps. I think that a new VU should consist of Solar, Magnus, Harbinger, Rai/Bloodshot, XO, Shadowman, EW/A&A, Dr. Mirage and maybe Ninjak or something new. I think that H.Corps-a great book-is not essential. Neither is Turok, or Secret Weapons, nor Psilords. There is no need for Timewalker or Geomancer or Visitor. Punx simply was not on the radar.
- ManofTheAtom
- Deathmate was cool
- Posts: 13438
- Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2004 5:19 pm
- Location: Mexico City
- Contact:
- jedimarley
- Evra'Ting Ire Mon.
- Posts: 16063
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:44 pm
- ManofTheAtom
- Deathmate was cool
- Posts: 13438
- Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2004 5:19 pm
- Location: Mexico City
- Contact:
- Daniel Jackson
- A toast to the return of Valiant!
- Posts: 38007
- Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2004 8:33 pm
Incorporating all of the brothers in one book worked for me, but like I've said before Gilad was not represented well at all. A premise that the new VU could correct in a flash by making him less like a bloodthirsty villain. I don't see a problem with the Eternal Warriors concept myself. If the sales warrant it expand A&A and Timewalker to some mini-series or specials later on.
- k_c_collectibles
- Walmart - ALWAYS low prices!
- Posts: 3238
- Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2004 11:10 am
- Location: Granville, NY
I TOTALLY agree with that!Daniel Jackson wrote:Incorporating all of the brothers in one book worked for me, but like I've said before Gilad was not represented well at all. A premise that the new VU could correct in a flash by making him less like a bloodthirsty villain. I don't see a problem with the Eternal Warriors concept myself. If the sales warrant it expand A&A and Timewalker to some mini-series or specials later on.

The only way I would want it any different is if BWS wanted to work on Archer & Armstrong again. Than I would be VERY happy!!!

Chris
Hundreds of Valiant and Acclaim comics for GREAT prices! http://www.webstore.com/shop.php?user_id=96791
- ManofTheAtom
- Deathmate was cool
- Posts: 13438
- Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2004 5:19 pm
- Location: Mexico City
- Contact:
The problem with the premise of mixing up the two-three concepts together is that they're no story there.
Gilad had his story, Aram had his story, and Ivar had his story.
Together they don't have a story worth telling, so at best you end up with an anthology series that alternates between them (i.e. one issue for Gilad, two issues for Aram, one issue for Ivar, three issues with the three together, etc, etc, etc), which, to me, isn't appealing.
I don't want to read three or four Gilad stories a year, I'd rather have 12 EW stories, 12 A&A stories, and 12 Ivar stories.
Gilad had his story, Aram had his story, and Ivar had his story.
Together they don't have a story worth telling, so at best you end up with an anthology series that alternates between them (i.e. one issue for Gilad, two issues for Aram, one issue for Ivar, three issues with the three together, etc, etc, etc), which, to me, isn't appealing.
I don't want to read three or four Gilad stories a year, I'd rather have 12 EW stories, 12 A&A stories, and 12 Ivar stories.
- Daniel Jackson
- A toast to the return of Valiant!
- Posts: 38007
- Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2004 8:33 pm
Yeah, if something like that happens I could see A&A going with their own monthly title.k_c_collectibles wrote:I TOTALLY agree with that!Daniel Jackson wrote:Incorporating all of the brothers in one book worked for me, but like I've said before Gilad was not represented well at all. A premise that the new VU could correct in a flash by making him less like a bloodthirsty villain. I don't see a problem with the Eternal Warriors concept myself. If the sales warrant it expand A&A and Timewalker to some mini-series or specials later on.![]()
The only way I would want it any different is if BWS wanted to work on Archer & Armstrong again. Than I would be VERY happy!!!![]()
Chris
- Elveen
- I sell comics, I collect Valiant.
- Posts: 25252
- Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2006 2:44 am
- Location: Educating the future of America, or something like that
jedimarley wrote:Some of us would have hooked him up with a set for free.ManofTheAtom wrote:He can do so much better things with his money that buy a VH 2 comic...jedimarley wrote:How about we read it before we make fun of it.
But since you made up his mind for him...............
for the record.... I have read some Acclaim stuff, it was different, but I still liked most of it.
I will want to get the acclaim stuff, (I have already printed of the checkllist from the site) I am hoping to get to a few LCSs this summer to see what they might have.
The Pigs in Space pic had nothing to do with the Eternal Warriors book, but with the space ship comment. (Pigs is space was the first thing I thought about in conjunction with space ships..... what does that say about me?)
- k_c_collectibles
- Walmart - ALWAYS low prices!
- Posts: 3238
- Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2004 11:10 am
- Location: Granville, NY
You could fix that with 3 mini-stories (betwen 6 and 8 pages each) about each character that continue each month. Once in a while maybe you would have multiple brothers in the same story being told and make the story longer that month (16 or 24 pages instead of 8 or so).ManofTheAtom wrote:The problem with the premise of mixing up the two-three concepts together is that they're no story there.
Gilad had his story, Aram had his story, and Ivar had his story.
Together they don't have a story worth telling, so at best you end up with an anthology series that alternates between them (i.e. one issue for Gilad, two issues for Aram, one issue for Ivar, three issues with the three together, etc, etc, etc), which, to me, isn't appealing.
I don't want to read three or four Gilad stories a year, I'd rather have 12 EW stories, 12 A&A stories, and 12 Ivar stories.
Just my thought of how you can get a monthly fix of all 3 brothers in one book with them not being together in the same story all the time.

Chris
Hundreds of Valiant and Acclaim comics for GREAT prices! http://www.webstore.com/shop.php?user_id=96791
- ManofTheAtom
- Deathmate was cool
- Posts: 13438
- Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2004 5:19 pm
- Location: Mexico City
- Contact:
It's an idea, though I'd much rather have 24 page stories as opposed to just 6 or 8.k_c_collectibles wrote:You could fix that with 3 mini-stories (betwen 6 and 8 pages each) about each character that continue each month. Once in a while maybe you would have multiple brothers in the same story being told and make the story longer that month (16 or 24 pages instead of 8 or so).ManofTheAtom wrote:The problem with the premise of mixing up the two-three concepts together is that they're no story there.
Gilad had his story, Aram had his story, and Ivar had his story.
Together they don't have a story worth telling, so at best you end up with an anthology series that alternates between them (i.e. one issue for Gilad, two issues for Aram, one issue for Ivar, three issues with the three together, etc, etc, etc), which, to me, isn't appealing.
I don't want to read three or four Gilad stories a year, I'd rather have 12 EW stories, 12 A&A stories, and 12 Ivar stories.
Just my thought of how you can get a monthly fix of all 3 brothers in one book with them not being together in the same story all the time.![]()
Chris
I just don't see why the concepts have to be combined into one comic just because the characters are related.
What if a writer decided that Ivar isn't really an Anni-Padda?
- IanAlexavier
- Valiant. Back to basics.
- Posts: 6370
- Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2005 3:06 pm
- Location: SE Michigan, 21 bound books done.. many more to go...
What about using the Flip Book design to drop in related stories for characters who don't necessarily need a series.. or sharing a book. For example:
XO 5 is also TimeWalker 1..
Then 3 months later EW 8 is Timewalker 2..
Or 3 mnths later Harbinger is Timewlaker 10.. then next month XO 9 is Timewalker 3..
You could do all sorts of future planning with Timewalker and yet not make it a monthly title. If the runs start getting low, just kill it for a while and then start it back up when a good writer has an arch.
I saw get rid of Secret Weapons.. I like the team book approach when its a good story but you can do that by just running the story through the current titles.
I like 8 core titles.
I liked the Blood of Heroes idea.. I also didn't mind the idea of having several titles in the future..Magnus and Rai.. although I think that maybe Psi Lords were stuck in there to create some more reading for readers that wanted more reading material about that time/era/story.
IMHO--->
Armories: Not necessary
Secret Weapons: Not necessary
TimeWalker: Not necessary
Visitor: Not necessary
HARD Corps: Not necessary
Psi Lords: Not necessary
Dr. Mirage: Not necessary
GeoMancer: Not necessary
Turok: Not necessary
With 8-10 books, people could be Valiant ONLY readers.. If its that good, then thats where I might be

XO 5 is also TimeWalker 1..
Then 3 months later EW 8 is Timewalker 2..
Or 3 mnths later Harbinger is Timewlaker 10.. then next month XO 9 is Timewalker 3..
You could do all sorts of future planning with Timewalker and yet not make it a monthly title. If the runs start getting low, just kill it for a while and then start it back up when a good writer has an arch.
I saw get rid of Secret Weapons.. I like the team book approach when its a good story but you can do that by just running the story through the current titles.
I like 8 core titles.
I liked the Blood of Heroes idea.. I also didn't mind the idea of having several titles in the future..Magnus and Rai.. although I think that maybe Psi Lords were stuck in there to create some more reading for readers that wanted more reading material about that time/era/story.
IMHO--->
Armories: Not necessary
Secret Weapons: Not necessary
TimeWalker: Not necessary
Visitor: Not necessary
HARD Corps: Not necessary
Psi Lords: Not necessary
Dr. Mirage: Not necessary
GeoMancer: Not necessary
Turok: Not necessary
With 8-10 books, people could be Valiant ONLY readers.. If its that good, then thats where I might be

- superman-prime
- scratch 1 for the coog guys
- Posts: 23252
- Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 3:27 am
- Location: phx az (east valley)
- manningfan
- 100 posts! (if you round to the nearest 100)
- Posts: 76
- Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 3:17 am
- Location: Southern California
Is Barry even interrested in comics these days? The only stuff I ever see from him anymore are art books, and that's it. Last I heard, he was being typical BWS and refuseing to sign Valiant and Marvel books he worked on, has this changed?k_c_collectibles wrote:I TOTALLY agree with that!Daniel Jackson wrote:Incorporating all of the brothers in one book worked for me, but like I've said before Gilad was not represented well at all. A premise that the new VU could correct in a flash by making him less like a bloodthirsty villain. I don't see a problem with the Eternal Warriors concept myself. If the sales warrant it expand A&A and Timewalker to some mini-series or specials later on.![]()
The only way I would want it any different is if BWS wanted to work on Archer & Armstrong again. Than I would be VERY happy!!!![]()
Chris
- leonmallett
- My mind is sharp. Like a sharp thing.
- Posts: 9472
- Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 9:39 am
- Valiant fan since: 2006
- Favorite character: Shadowman (Hall version)
- Favorite title: Shadowman (under Hall)
- Favorite writer: Fred Van Lente
- Favorite artist: Clayton Henry
- Location: hunting down paulsmith56 somewhere in the balti belt...
Didn't Ultraverse also try the flip book approach with ongoing stories, and I don't know how successful it was. I like the idea in principle as I can see myself getting all of the books, but if someone is following only 1 or 2 books, and a character they are following is being flipped around all the titles, they may begrudge having to do so and so sales may actually be hurt since the cost of producing the flip book will need to incorporate two audiences, one of which may begrudge effectively paying more to read about the flipped character. In addition LCS retailers who are space conscious may not promote the flipped side as it were.IanAlexavier wrote:What about using the Flip Book design to drop in related stories for characters who don't necessarily need a series.. or sharing a book. For example:
XO 5 is also TimeWalker 1..
Then 3 months later EW 8 is Timewalker 2..
Or 3 mnths later Harbinger is Timewlaker 10.. then next month XO 9 is Timewalker 3..
You could do all sorts of future planning with Timewalker and yet not make it a monthly title. If the runs start getting low, just kill it for a while and then start it back up when a good writer has an arch.
I saw get rid of Secret Weapons.. I like the team book approach when its a good story but you can do that by just running the story through the current titles.
I like 8 core titles.
I liked the Blood of Heroes idea.. I also didn't mind the idea of having several titles in the future..Magnus and Rai.. although I think that maybe Psi Lords were stuck in there to create some more reading for readers that wanted more reading material about that time/era/story.
IMHO--->
Armories: Not necessary
Secret Weapons: Not necessary
TimeWalker: Not necessary
Visitor: Not necessary
HARD Corps: Not necessary
Psi Lords: Not necessary
Dr. Mirage: Not necessary
GeoMancer: Not necessary
Turok: Not necessary
With 8-10 books, people could be Valiant ONLY readers.. If its that good, then thats where I might be
VEI - I look forward to you one day publishing MORE than 9-10 books per month
- IanAlexavier
- Valiant. Back to basics.
- Posts: 6370
- Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2005 3:06 pm
- Location: SE Michigan, 21 bound books done.. many more to go...
- manningfan
- 100 posts! (if you round to the nearest 100)
- Posts: 76
- Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 3:17 am
- Location: Southern California
Just a little. Does anyone know an answer to my question about BWS?IanAlexavier wrote:oh yes, yes,.. books to bring back.. not HOW to bring them back..
Books to bring back..
Titles that we think are important...
How to incorporate secondary titles...
Flipbook/sharing issues convorsation...
Yes, we got off track)

- Daniel Jackson
- A toast to the return of Valiant!
- Posts: 38007
- Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2004 8:33 pm
Nothing has changed with Barry's attitude as far as I know. Especially after the fiasco with the unspeakable one and a certain Valiant fan project.manningfan wrote:Just a little. Does anyone know an answer to my question about BWS?IanAlexavier wrote:oh yes, yes,.. books to bring back.. not HOW to bring them back..
Books to bring back..
Titles that we think are important...
How to incorporate secondary titles...
Flipbook/sharing issues convorsation...
Yes, we got off track)
what am I missing here, I was gone for a long time?Daniel Jackson wrote:Nothing has changed with Barry's attitude as far as I know. Especially after the fiasco with the unspeakable one and a certain Valiant fan project.manningfan wrote:
Just a little. Does anyone know an answer to my question about BWS?
I liked Hard Corps as it was another coporation fighting against Harada. But I think for the beginning, Hard Corps would be better suited as supporting characters and not have their own books. Same thing with Armorines (the government would have to try to duplicate some of that alien technology).
Only thing I hope they don't do is bring back Ivar. Hated the idea of the character and it was like the first step away from what I liked about Pre-Unity... tight continuity. You've got somebody being a brother and never mentioned by Aram or Gilad prior to his introduction. He doesn't really fit into the dynamic between the two. In my opinion
For me, time travel shouldn't happen in the Valiant Universe. It's like the idea of dead is dead.
Only thing I hope they don't do is bring back Ivar. Hated the idea of the character and it was like the first step away from what I liked about Pre-Unity... tight continuity. You've got somebody being a brother and never mentioned by Aram or Gilad prior to his introduction. He doesn't really fit into the dynamic between the two. In my opinion
For me, time travel shouldn't happen in the Valiant Universe. It's like the idea of dead is dead.