Phil Seleski?
Moderators: Daniel Jackson, greg
-
- Get those scissors away from my coupons
- Posts: 330
- Joined: Fri Sep 13, 2013 11:49 pm
- Valiant fan since: 90s
- Favorite character: Peter Stanchek
- Favorite title: XOmanowar
- Favorite writer: ?
Phil Seleski?
Just wondering if VEI owns the rights to the character Phil Seleski (sans the Solar persona), or if that's public domain? I see that in their solicits for the new Solar ongoing, Dynamite is using the name Phil Seleski as their Solar, instead of the Doctor Solar name used by Gold Key and subsequently Dark Horse when they acquired the liscensing for the Gold Key characters, before reverting back to Western. Maybe this has been covered before, but I don't recall, and I'm wondering what the deal is. If Dynamite can use this character, what prevents them from using other VH1 characters?
- Heath
- The Saints will win the Super-Bowl!
- Posts: 11527
- Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2004 7:05 pm
- Valiant fan since: 1992
- Favorite character: VH1 Shadowman; VEI X-O
- Favorite title: VH1 Shadowman; VEI X-O, Harb
- Favorite writer: Bob Hall; Dysart, Van Lente
- Location: Torque's Hundred-Yard-Long New Orleans Saints' Themed Dining Hall
Re: Phil Seleski?
How is Dynamite getting away with using Phil Seleski?
I would agree with you, but then we'd both be wrong.
- xodacia81
- Here I am, happy as a clam
- Posts: 18404
- Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2007 10:09 pm
- Location: East of Chicago, West of New York
Re: Phil Seleski?
Really good question. Is VEI leasing it to them?Heath wrote:How is Dynamite getting away with using Phil Seleski?
- Phoenix8008
- I don't know about a power, but I keep hearing these weird tones from the radio
- Posts: 3257
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2008 7:49 am
- Valiant fan since: 1992
- Favorite character: Aric
- Favorite title: Harbinger
- Favorite writer: Joshua Dysart
- Location: Florida, USA
Re: Phil Seleski?
THAT would be hilarious! If VEI was actually making some money off of Dynamite doing this, I'd approve. Although I still wouldn't buy any of the Dynamite titles myself.xodacia81 wrote:Really good question. Is VEI leasing it to them?Heath wrote:How is Dynamite getting away with using Phil Seleski?
-Phoenix8008 (a.k.a. Charticus!)
Viva la Valiant!
(moderator of r/Valiant subreddit)
Viva la Valiant!
(moderator of r/Valiant subreddit)
- Elveen
- I sell comics, I collect Valiant.
- Posts: 25252
- Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2006 2:44 am
- Location: Educating the future of America, or something like that
Re: Phil Seleski?
xodacia81 wrote:Really good question. Is VEI leasing it to them?Heath wrote:How is Dynamite getting away with using Phil Seleski?
No way, no chance.
-
- Get those scissors away from my coupons
- Posts: 330
- Joined: Fri Sep 13, 2013 11:49 pm
- Valiant fan since: 90s
- Favorite character: Peter Stanchek
- Favorite title: XOmanowar
- Favorite writer: ?
Re: Phil Seleski?
I would say it was just a typo on comic resources, but I checked Dynamite's own solicits page and it clearly states Phil Seleski. Hmmmm
-
- Get those scissors away from my coupons
- Posts: 330
- Joined: Fri Sep 13, 2013 11:49 pm
- Valiant fan since: 90s
- Favorite character: Peter Stanchek
- Favorite title: XOmanowar
- Favorite writer: ?
Re: Phil Seleski?
I also seem to remember that Gold Key/ Western held the rights to Turok Son of Stone, but not Turok Dinosaur Hunter, yet that's what Dynamite is utilizing for their new incarnation
- Phantom
- I will call my mum and ask what the *SQUEE* is going on.
- Posts: 4294
- Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2005 4:28 pm
- Location: I would rather be under the stars in a tent, or on a park bench.
Re: Phil Seleski?
good point.
will be interesting how this pans out.

will be interesting how this pans out.
I wish their was a Spinal Tap comic, and I had a copy CGC graded at 11.
- comicsyte95
- It's Porktastic!!!
- Posts: 9572
- Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2008 7:30 pm
- Location: somewhere in the valiant universe
Re: Phil Seleski?
I don't think Dynamite has the rights to the name.If it is without permission and/if they don't have rights and isn't a typo it is a slap in the face to VEI. 

If I just can't be me ,and the Arrow isn't enough.. then maybe I should be Ra's al Ghul
- Phantom
- I will call my mum and ask what the *SQUEE* is going on.
- Posts: 4294
- Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2005 4:28 pm
- Location: I would rather be under the stars in a tent, or on a park bench.
Re: Phil Seleski?
most likely be a mistake.researching solar and reading through books ~ picked up the name, thought they could use it?
perhaps?
A letter from valiant to Dynamite, would stop its use.
If they care.
perhaps?
A letter from valiant to Dynamite, would stop its use.
If they care.
I wish their was a Spinal Tap comic, and I had a copy CGC graded at 11.
- comicsyte95
- It's Porktastic!!!
- Posts: 9572
- Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2008 7:30 pm
- Location: somewhere in the valiant universe
Re: Phil Seleski?
It could just be an honest mistake.but I remember an old quote on cops I saw a few weeks agoPhantom wrote:most likely be a mistake.researching solar and reading through books ~ picked up the name, thought they could use it?
" ignorance of the law is no excuse " .That could be applied here.
If I just can't be me ,and the Arrow isn't enough.. then maybe I should be Ra's al Ghul
- LABRADORIAN
- 100 posts! (if you round to the nearest 100)
- Posts: 94
- Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 11:51 am
Re: Phil Seleski?
Maybe its possible that VE never owned the rights to Gold Key Characters even if you added the name Phil Seleski, if VE doesnt own the name then Dynamite has all the right in the world to use it.
- bygranddesign
- it sounds like "chuffed" goes both ways
- Posts: 3384
- Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2012 5:53 pm
- Valiant fan since: 1992
- Favorite character: Peter Stanchek
- Favorite title: Harbinger
- Favorite writer: Joshua Dysart
- Location: Jacksonville, Florida
Re: Phil Seleski?
BugsySig wrote:Yes, they own Phil Seleski and Erica Pierce.

does Hawkeye know this?
You might have to keep him away from sharp objects
Ha! Yeah! Nice! Any of those dudes in your head mosh?! - Flamingo
- BugsySig
- I could be talking poo-doo.
- Posts: 9554
- Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 7:47 pm
- Valiant fan since: 1992
- Favorite character: Ivar, Timewalker
- Favorite title: Harbinger/Timewalker
- Favorite writer: Joshua Dysart/FVL
- Favorite artist: Joe Quesada
- Location: Central CT
Re: Phil Seleski?
I forget where I saw it (probably here on this board) but someone did a quick search for the rights to the name Turok Dinosaur Hunter and it is registered by someone at the parent company (random house, I believe) that owns (or owned) the Gold Key Characters.Aomalle27 wrote:I also seem to remember that Gold Key/ Western held the rights to Turok Son of Stone, but not Turok Dinosaur Hunter, yet that's what Dynamite is utilizing for their new incarnation
Kurt Busiek wrote:Bull$#!t

- Ladakh
- Cruisin' in Darpan's Winnebago
- Posts: 669
- Joined: Tue Jun 04, 2013 4:19 pm
- Valiant fan since: 1991
- Favorite character: Solar
- Favorite title: Solar
- Favorite writer: Jim Shooter
- Location: Orb Industries Headquarters
Re: Phil Seleski?
Jim Shooter owns the trademark on "Phil Seleski"... he named him.
Re: Phil Seleski?
Wasn't it a relative of his?Knob Row wrote:Jim Shooter owns the trademark on "Phil Seleski"... he named him.
/Magnus
-
- Get those scissors away from my coupons
- Posts: 330
- Joined: Fri Sep 13, 2013 11:49 pm
- Valiant fan since: 90s
- Favorite character: Peter Stanchek
- Favorite title: XOmanowar
- Favorite writer: ?
Re: Phil Seleski?
If that's true, why was he not able to use the character during the Dark Horse reboot?magnusr wrote:Wasn't it a relative of his?Knob Row wrote:Jim Shooter owns the trademark on "Phil Seleski"... he named him.
/Magnus
Doen't make sense that Shooter would own the trademark for the name either, since Shooter named a lot of VH1 characters.
VH1 wasn't a creator owned entity, If this was an old Image comic, I'd say that would be plausible, but not likely for VH1.
I'm wondering if there's legal wrangling going on right now, certainly with Dynamite actually using the properties, would establish "damages" per se, versus the potential misuse of a trademarked property. In which case, every issue of the infringed sold, (ie. I think Turok sold 37000) would be legally the right of the damaged party. (Thus VEI would actually profit from every issue of Dynamite infringed comics, at this point only Turok Dinosaur Hunter has infringed, potentially the solicits violate for Phil Seleski solar. If they actually use the character in print, then damages are established.
Re: Phil Seleski?
The matter of trademark does involve a lot more than who came up with the name originally. For instance, they have to be defended a lot more rigorously than copyrights, which there is a huge risk has not been done.Aomalle27 wrote:If that's true, why was he not able to use the character during the Dark Horse reboot?magnusr wrote:Wasn't it a relative of his?Knob Row wrote:Jim Shooter owns the trademark on "Phil Seleski"... he named him.
/Magnus
Doen't make sense that Shooter would own the trademark for the name either, since Shooter named a lot of VH1 characters.
VH1 wasn't a creator owned entity, If this was an old Image comic, I'd say that would be plausible, but not likely for VH1.
I'm wondering if there's legal wrangling going on right now, certainly with Dynamite actually using the properties, would establish "damages" per se, versus the potential misuse of a trademarked property. In which case, every issue of the infringed sold, (ie. I think Turok sold 37000) would be legally the right of the damaged party. (Thus VEI would actually profit from every issue of Dynamite infringed comics, at this point only Turok Dinosaur Hunter has infringed, potentially the solicits violate for Phil Seleski solar. If they actually use the character in print, then damages are established.
/Magnus
- hawkeyeps
- Everybody gets some "little extras"
- Posts: 3020
- Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2012 9:02 pm
- Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Re: Phil Seleski?
I think what Bugs is saying is that VEI owns Seleski and Pierce. While I can see a possible case for Seleski I can't see it for Erica, that was a new character created from VH1.bygranddesign wrote:BugsySig wrote:Yes, they own Phil Seleski and Erica Pierce.![]()
does Hawkeye know this?
You might have to keep him away from sharp objects
Same goes for Tekla, if she shows up in Magnus I would think something really stinks.
- kjjohanson
- Now I bet you're all going to want me to drag it out and show you.
- Posts: 5005
- Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2007 6:52 pm
- Valiant fan since: Magnus #1
- Favorite character: Anon-Lurker
- Favorite title: Archer & Armstrong
- Favorite writer: Fred Van Lente
- Location: Astoria, NY
- Contact:
Re: Phil Seleski?
Could it be the case that a common name can't be trademarked? If they're only using the name, but no other aspect of the character that was unique to the Valiant version then maybe it's legal?
If you're not a *SQUEE*, you're okay with me.
- lorddunlow
- I think you might be a closeted Canadian.
- Posts: 13594
- Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2010 11:51 pm
Re: Phil Seleski?
The fact that no one from VEI has come on here to clarify tells me there is probably some legal action being taken.
If it was in the free and clear for Dynamite to use, I would think Dino would have popped in to say "yeah, unfortunately, blah, blah..."
If it were a mistake and they had no rights to it, Dynamite would (or at should) have issued a retraction/correction.
The silence would occur if legal wrangling were happening.
If it was in the free and clear for Dynamite to use, I would think Dino would have popped in to say "yeah, unfortunately, blah, blah..."
If it were a mistake and they had no rights to it, Dynamite would (or at should) have issued a retraction/correction.
The silence would occur if legal wrangling were happening.
*SQUEE* your science, I have a machine gun.
- xodacia81
- Here I am, happy as a clam
- Posts: 18404
- Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2007 10:09 pm
- Location: East of Chicago, West of New York
Re: Phil Seleski?
This stinks of a Very Important Past incident. If you know what I mean.
- hawkeyeps
- Everybody gets some "little extras"
- Posts: 3020
- Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2012 9:02 pm
- Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Re: Phil Seleski?
The Ashcan!! History repeating??
Like I say if Dynamite bites on Erica and Tekla something is seriously wrong
Like I say if Dynamite bites on Erica and Tekla something is seriously wrong
