Why did Valiant sanatize it's later titles?
Moderators: Daniel Jackson, greg
- Todd Luck
- Doomed to forever roam the black halls
- Posts: 4729
- Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2004 1:02 pm
- Location: Winston-Salem, NC
Why did Valiant sanatize it's later titles?
Early Valiants were probably some of the most violent mainstream comics at the time. They didn't flinch at protraying violence realisticly. Blood, gore, ect was displayed on panel. But at some point it changed. The later titles had a lot less blood, almost no gore, and death and injury wasn't so terrible. The change seems to start in the titles dated somewhere around mid to late 1993.
For instance, Shadowman 13 dealt with a serial killer and it had realistic amount of blood in it. You cut people they're bound to bleed...alot. Very few issues of the series had much blood or graphic violence after that, and I dare say none to that level. My question is why? Was this a conscious editorial desicion or just a side effect of a different creative direction? Does anyone know?
For instance, Shadowman 13 dealt with a serial killer and it had realistic amount of blood in it. You cut people they're bound to bleed...alot. Very few issues of the series had much blood or graphic violence after that, and I dare say none to that level. My question is why? Was this a conscious editorial desicion or just a side effect of a different creative direction? Does anyone know?
- Unblessed
- I must be flogged.
- Posts: 5533
- Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2005 11:00 pm
- Location: Slippin' through the trees, stanglin' the breeze
no idea but I just read EW I forget the number, but the one where Gil is armless and had the warning on the cover... Yeah, useless warning. I was thinking about what you posted when I read it this morning.
*edit*
Point of contention: He stabs his daughter through her heart... no blood coming out where he went into her (right above her heart). Utter sanitization.
~Unblessed
*edit*
Point of contention: He stabs his daughter through her heart... no blood coming out where he went into her (right above her heart). Utter sanitization.
~Unblessed
-
- Cruisin' in Darpan's Winnebago
- Posts: 661
- Joined: Sat May 01, 2004 10:55 pm
- Location: louisiana
The only reason I can think of why they did that was at the time, Valiant went from a small unheard of publisher with more of a narrower audience to trying to make a book for the masses. I think they just did that to broaden the appeal to a larger and dare I say, younger audience. i could be wrong but thats what I think off the top of my head.
- mrwoogieman
- All this talk of 'snipping' is making me keep my legs crossed.
- Posts: 4056
- Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2004 8:13 pm
- Location: THE LOST LAND
- Vault-Keeper
- Mr. Sunshine
- Posts: 4361
- Joined: Thu Mar 04, 2004 9:31 am
- Location: Harbinger Foundation
The following is speculation on my part, but it is based on a factual occurance. During the mid 90's, complaint's were made to Wal-Mart's & 7-11's from Christian groups about the excess sex & violence in the magazines & comics they carried. In order to avoid a loss of circulation, many comic titles were toned down, & some were dropped completely, like the newstand version of the EC reprints.
To expand their circulation, Valiant was trying to establish newstand distribution around this same time. They might have toned down the sex & violence in order to fit PG guidelines for broader distributon. If VanHook reads this, I think he'd know for sure.---Steve
To expand their circulation, Valiant was trying to establish newstand distribution around this same time. They might have toned down the sex & violence in order to fit PG guidelines for broader distributon. If VanHook reads this, I think he'd know for sure.---Steve
- Vault-Keeper
- Mr. Sunshine
- Posts: 4361
- Joined: Thu Mar 04, 2004 9:31 am
- Location: Harbinger Foundation
- wrunow
- Where are you now?
- Posts: 3658
- Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2004 10:10 am
- Valiant fan since: 1991
- Favorite character: They killed her off!
- Favorite title: Harbinger
- Favorite writer: Dysart
- Favorite artist: Nord
- Location: York, Maine
In my opinion, as VALIANT progressed they hired more and more of the established artists in the industry, Sears, Breyfogle, Moretti, etc. and they brought there styles that were mainly formed at Marvel or DC, and drew the Valiant characters as such.
Also, I think the change when BWS was no longer the art director had some major impact here, probably the most as he is/was a stickler for fine detailed art.
Also, I think the change when BWS was no longer the art director had some major impact here, probably the most as he is/was a stickler for fine detailed art.
I am selling "nothing" on ebay-yet.
-
- If you gave Aric hugs and kisses, would it be XOXO X-O?
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 3:34 pm
- Shakespeare
- You gotta have Faith!
- Posts: 895
- Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2004 3:08 pm
- Location: Denver
- Todd Luck
- Doomed to forever roam the black halls
- Posts: 4729
- Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2004 1:02 pm
- Location: Winston-Salem, NC
Shakespeare wrote:I'm still trying to get the brains out of that jacket.myron wrote:What about where Shakespear kills Big Boy in Hardcorps 2???...that was one of the most violent comic frames I had ever seen...

Anyway, the trying to reach a wider audience does sounds like a plausible explaination. Curiously I read something like that about Superman and Batman back when they were first introduced. The higher their sales were, the better their behavior got.
I remember reading that Valiant lost a deal were Toys R Us would carry their comic in some form because one panel in Rai 0 went too low down Bloodshot's back for them. Blew the whole deal.
The 90's was a very strange time. You'ld have characters that do nothing but kill, but when it came to showing the violence it was strangely restrained. I remember thumbing through a Mortal Kombat comic and shaking my head at the lack of any gorey death moves done on panel. Lame.
- motorhead
- My posts can all fit in a short box
- Posts: 235
- Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2005 5:21 pm
- Location: Parts Unknown.
You want violent comics from the 90's? Check out North Star Press. That was about as violent as you could get. Between Faust and Boots Of The Oppressor, I don't think you can get much worse. The cruel facts are that gory and Violent comics , or the companies that publish them don't last. Look at the whole list of companies out there that have came and gone; North Star, NOW, Fantagraphics, Innovation, even Dark Horse Had to change to survive, which sucks. Look at what the company was, and look at it now.
Last edited by motorhead on Fri Sep 30, 2005 2:04 am, edited 1 time in total.
Good morning.
-
- Chief of the Dia Tribe
- Posts: 22415
- Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2004 8:55 pm
- motorhead
- My posts can all fit in a short box
- Posts: 235
- Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2005 5:21 pm
- Location: Parts Unknown.
Yup, and much better quality as well!Unblessed wrote:Yup, but they were more realistic than later stuff.motorhead wrote:So true on that one.ZephyrWasHOT!! wrote:You know what's REALLY funny? Until people bring it up, I never ever think "violent" when I think of Pre-Unity. It's just natural, you don't even think about it.
~Unblessed

Good morning.
- Todd Luck
- Doomed to forever roam the black halls
- Posts: 4729
- Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2004 1:02 pm
- Location: Winston-Salem, NC
I just posted that issue on the Re-reading forum. I just realized it actually goes along with what I posted on this thread about high sales equaling nicer comics. The sales had dropped through the floor and what's the first thing that happens? Gilad gets an arm lobbed offUnblessed wrote:no idea but I just read EW I forget the number, but the one where Gil is armless and had the warning on the cover... Yeah, useless warning. I was thinking about what you posted when I read it this morning.
*edit*
Point of contention: He stabs his daughter through her heart... no blood coming out where he went into her (right above her heart). Utter sanitization.
~Unblessed



Btw, is that storyline any good? I don't have any issues of it. The Immortal Enemy story before it really blew but I know Orstrander gets better on the title.
- Unblessed
- I must be flogged.
- Posts: 5533
- Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2005 11:00 pm
- Location: Slippin' through the trees, stanglin' the breeze
The premise: Gilad has kids with women through out the ages. When the kids grow up, they all get a blood lust to kill their parents.Todd Luck wrote:
Btw, is that storyline any good? I don't have any issues of it. The Immortal Enemy story before it really blew but I know Orstrander gets better on the title.
I think the premise is interesting.
The story opens with him fighting one of his offspring at the turn of the 20th centrury in London. He puts her down. Other than that, the story is quite bland. they reduced Gilad to Aric the barbarian. It read like an XO issue to me for some reason.
~Unblessed