CGC Goof

x-omatic · Post by **x-omatic** » Wed Mar 23, 2005 10:25 am

X-O HoboJoe wrote:
x-omatic wrote:
X-O HoboJoe wrote:Oh great, now he's got a Village Idiot e-con . . .

that by all rights looks more like ME!

ThankyousirmayIhaveanother?

DawgPhan · Post by **DawgPhan** » Wed Mar 23, 2005 11:05 am

Peter Parker wrote:CGC makes mistakes is right, and I could tell you many of mine. MY most recent and revelvent on THIS board was my Solar# 10 which I was TOLD had graded a CGC 9.9 (the 1st one as of yet) but was told Monday it was a "clerical error" and it was "another" book of mine that graded so, and the books were mis-directed into the data base

I've had books damaged, and on and on...but I still support them, and think they do a very good job overall. Were human, we ALL make mistakes, its silly to expect 100% perfection of ANYTHING let alone...humans

So no solar 10 9.9? That sucks..I would have liked to have seen a scan of it or something...At least you got 1 9.9, right?

Peter Parker · Post by **Peter Parker** » Wed Mar 23, 2005 11:11 am

DawgPhan wrote:
Peter Parker wrote:CGC makes mistakes is right, and I could tell you many of mine. MY most recent and revelvent on THIS board was my Solar# 10 which I was TOLD had graded a CGC 9.9 (the 1st one as of yet) but was told Monday it was a "clerical error" and it was "another" book of mine that graded so, and the books were mis-directed into the data base

I've had books damaged, and on and on...but I still support them, and think they do a very good job overall. Were human, we ALL make mistakes, its silly to expect 100% perfection of ANYTHING let alone...humans
So no solar 10 9.9? That sucks..I would have liked to have seen a scan of it or something...At least you got 1 9.9, right?

yep, my 6th

Escaflown4 · Post by **Escaflown4** » Mon Mar 28, 2005 11:25 am

So this means there have yet been any pre-unity books that got higher then a 9.8......

Unblessed · Post by **Unblessed** » Mon Mar 28, 2005 11:35 am

Peter Parker wrote:I've had books damaged

I would flip out a la http://www.realultimatepower.net style on their *SQUEE*.

~The Unblessed Soul

Peter Parker · Post by **Peter Parker** » Mon Mar 28, 2005 1:39 pm

Unblessed wrote:
Peter Parker wrote:I've had books damaged
I would flip out a la http://www.realultimatepower.net style on their *SQUEE*.

~The Unblessed Soul

that site was funny.

Yes, they've damaged books of mine. However, they have also always made "proper" restitution

DawgPhan · Post by **DawgPhan** » Mon Mar 28, 2005 1:41 pm

Peter Parker wrote:
Unblessed wrote:
Peter Parker wrote:I've had books damaged
I would flip out a la http://www.realultimatepower.net style on their *SQUEE*.

~The Unblessed Soul

that site was funny.

Yes, they've damaged books of mine. However, they have also always made "proper" restitution

Which what sets them apart in my book. Sure they make a mistake, but they are going to make you whole no matter what...